Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 20 November 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 20 NOVEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Anthony Colin Finnegan
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Witnesses

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Arlene Maree Taylor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Holly Joy Rowlands
v
Neil Lyndon Grice and ors

4:15 p.m.
Vary Mediation Order by Telephone
Tasmanian Botanics Pty Ltd
v
Mark Richard De Vries and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction

9:45am For Admission
Jessica Lee Stewart

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Belinda Leone Colbran
Nathan Thomas Smith

LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Robert John Bell

For Trial
RPB

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Anthony Colin Finnegan
v

The State of Tasmania

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had several cases listed for the day of 20 November 2018, including both criminal and civil matters. The court was set to hear directions hearings, trials, and miscellaneous civil business. One of the criminal cases involved Anthony Colin Finnegan, who had a directions hearing scheduled via video link from Burnie. Another criminal case involved Robert John Bell, who had a mention hearing in Burnie. Civil cases included a miscellaneous civil business hearing and a trial in Launceston. The court was also set to hear a directions hearing in a case involving Holly Joy Rowlands, which was to be conducted by telephone.

The legal issues that the court was required to address in these cases included directions hearings in criminal cases, trials for both criminal and civil matters, and a miscellaneous civil business hearing. The court needed to ensure that the proceedings were conducted in accordance with the law and that the rights of all parties were protected. In the criminal cases, the court needed to consider issues such as the admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the trial, and the sentencing of the accused if found guilty. In the civil cases, the court needed to consider issues such as the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of contracts or other legal documents, and the determination of damages or other remedies.

The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases were not detailed in the provided text. However, it is likely that the court considered the relevant laws and legal principles in reaching its decisions. The court may have also considered the evidence presented by the parties, as well as any arguments or submissions made by the lawyers representing the parties. The outcome of the cases would have depended on the specific facts and circumstances of each case, as well as the applicable legal principles. The court's decisions would have been communicated to the parties and their lawyers, and any orders or judgments would have been recorded in the court's records.

If any final orders were made in these cases, they would have been communicated to the parties and their lawyers. The orders would have reflected the court's decisions on the legal issues that were before it, and would have included any directions, rulings, or judgments that were necessary to resolve the matters that were before the court. The orders would have been recorded in the court's records and would have been enforceable by the parties and their lawyers.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established