Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 2 April 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 2 APRIL 2019

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
NMM

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Craig Raymond Silva
v
The State of Tasmania

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Darren Ward Gale

For Directions Hearing
NVL

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Cody Steven Faltusz

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Matthew James Badkin

4:15pm For Bail Application
Caitlin McGee

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Gary Robert Streets
v
Bakery One Pty Ltd and Ors

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Nathan Coppleman
(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved Craig Raymond Silva and the State of Tasmania. Silva was facing a directions hearing, which took place via video link before Justice Wood. The nature of the dispute involved legal proceedings against Silva, though the specifics of the charges or allegations were not detailed in the case summary provided. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate course of action for Silva's case.

The primary legal issue that the court had to address was the direction to be taken in Silva's case, which involved a hearing to outline the procedural steps moving forward. This included assessing the evidence, scheduling any necessary further hearings, and ensuring that Silva's rights were protected throughout the legal process. The court had to consider the specifics of Silva's case, including any mitigating or aggravating factors, and decide on the appropriate legal strategies.

Justice Wood presided over the directions hearing and provided guidance on the next steps for Silva's case. The court's reasoning focused on ensuring that the legal process adhered to procedural fairness and that Silva was informed of his rights and the potential outcomes. The outcome of the hearing was that the court outlined a clear path forward, setting dates for further hearings and ensuring that all parties were aware of the timeline and requirements. This ensured that Silva's case would proceed in a manner that was transparent and just, with all procedural steps clearly defined.

The final orders from the court included scheduling further hearings to allow for the presentation of evidence and arguments, ensuring that Silva had adequate representation, and setting a timeline for the resolution of the case. The court's decision was aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal process and ensuring that Silva's rights were fully protected throughout the proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established