LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 18 JUNE 2019
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Robert Michael Allen
v
State of Tasmania
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher John Worker
For Trial
BP
(part-heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Aaron Joshua Allie
v
The State of Tasmania
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Tye Paul Silver
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Leigh Reginald Dobson
Samuel James Franklin
Carley Anne Watkins
For Mention
Benjamin William Rae
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
12pm
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30a.m.
For Trial
Mark Rodney Jones
(Part Heard)
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
SAA
Kerry Lee Cooper
4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Ayden Jason McHenry
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew Paul O’Brien
Part Heard
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 18 June 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 124
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 124
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Criminal Appeal carefully reviewed the arguments presented by both parties. It considered whether the lower court had correctly applied the law, whether there were any procedural errors, and if the sentence imposed was appropriate. The court also examined whether the outcome of the trial was fair and just, taking into account all the evidence and legal principles involved. The appeal court's reasoning was meticulous, focusing on the specifics of the case to determine if any errors had indeed occurred. Ultimately, the court decided that there were no substantial errors or miscarriages of justice that warranted altering the original decision.
The final outcome of the appeal was that the Court of Criminal Appeal upheld the decision of the lower court. The appeal was dismissed, meaning that the original judgment and sentence remained in place. This decision signifies that the court found the lower court's handling of the case to be correct and lawful, without any significant errors that would necessitate a change in the outcome.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.