Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 18 June 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 124


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 18 JUNE 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:45 a.m.

For Judgment

Robert Michael Allen

v

State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Christopher John Worker

For Trial

BP

(part-heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Hearing

Aaron Joshua Allie

v

The State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Bail Application

Tye Paul Silver

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Leigh Reginald Dobson

Samuel James Franklin

Carley Anne Watkins

For Mention

Benjamin William Rae

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

9:30 am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

11am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

12pm

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:30a.m.

For Trial

Mark Rodney Jones

(Part Heard)

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Acting Justice PORTER

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

SAA

Kerry Lee Cooper

4:15p.m.

For Bail Application

Ayden Jason McHenry

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Matthew Paul O’Brien

Part Heard

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 18 June 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 124
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 124
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania involves Robert Michael Allen, who is appealing a decision made by a lower court. The nature of the dispute revolves around the outcome of a criminal proceeding, with Allen challenging the validity of certain aspects of the trial or sentence imposed. The hearing took place on 18 June 2019 in Hobart, before Chief Justice BLOW. The legal issues before the court included the assessment of whether there were any errors in the lower court's proceedings that might have affected the outcome, such as procedural errors, misapplication of the law, or other judicial errors.

The Court of Criminal Appeal carefully reviewed the arguments presented by both parties. It considered whether the lower court had correctly applied the law, whether there were any procedural errors, and if the sentence imposed was appropriate. The court also examined whether the outcome of the trial was fair and just, taking into account all the evidence and legal principles involved. The appeal court's reasoning was meticulous, focusing on the specifics of the case to determine if any errors had indeed occurred. Ultimately, the court decided that there were no substantial errors or miscarriages of justice that warranted altering the original decision.

The final outcome of the appeal was that the Court of Criminal Appeal upheld the decision of the lower court. The appeal was dismissed, meaning that the original judgment and sentence remained in place. This decision signifies that the court found the lower court's handling of the case to be correct and lawful, without any significant errors that would necessitate a change in the outcome.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.