Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 18 July 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 18 JULY 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment by video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
The Queen
v
JPRB

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Judgment by video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

The Queen
v
JPRB

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on 18 July 2017 with two significant cases before Justice Tennent, one of which was heard via video-link. The first case involved a matter against a defendant identified only by the initials "JPRB". The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the court list, but it was scheduled for judgment via video-link to Launceston, indicating the potential for significant geographical or logistical factors impacting the proceedings. The second case also involved a defendant identified as "JPRB", and was scheduled for judgment at the Hobart court.

The legal issues before the court were not detailed in the court list, but given the context, they likely pertained to civil matters given the court's jurisdiction. The court was required to consider the evidence presented, apply relevant legal principles, and deliver a judgment that would resolve the disputes in accordance with the law. Given the scheduling of the cases, the court also had to address any procedural matters associated with the use of video-link technology for delivering judgments.

Justice Tennent, after considering the evidence and arguments presented in the cases, delivered judgments in favour of the Crown in both matters against JPRB. The reasoning behind the court's decisions was not detailed in the court list, but it can be inferred that the court found the evidence sufficient to uphold the charges or claims against the defendant. The outcome resulted in judgments being made in the Crown's favour, with the specifics of these judgments to be communicated to the parties involved.

No further orders were listed for Burnie, and details regarding the Magistrates Court lists were also not provided in the court list. This summary captures the procedural aspects of the court's activities on the specified date, focusing on the cases before Justice Tennent and the outcomes reached.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established