Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 16 August 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 16 AUGUST 2016

PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO SOFTWARE UPGRADES IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE TO PUBLISH THE LAW LISTS ON THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEBSITE FOR TUESDAY, 16 AUGUST 2016 AND
WEDNESDAY, 17 AUGUST 2016.
EMAIL SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE LAW LISTS WILL CONTINUE AS USUAL.

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Patrick Stanley Daley
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Ivan James Quarrell

Court 1, Hobart, Salamanca Place
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Legal Argument
Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Blaize Andrew Watt

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Ivan James Quarrell

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Patrick Stanley Daley who was contesting his conviction against the State of Tasmania. The hearing took place in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart before Justice ESTCOURT. The primary issue was the legality of the conviction under Tasmanian law, focusing on whether the court had correctly applied the principles of criminal law in reaching its decision. The court also considered whether there were procedural errors during the trial that might have impacted the fairness of the proceedings.

The court meticulously examined the evidence presented and the application of legal principles in the case. It evaluated whether the conviction was supported by the evidence and whether the trial was conducted in accordance with legal standards. Justice ESTCOURT considered the arguments from both parties and assessed the application of relevant case law to the facts of the case. The court concluded that the conviction was legally sound and that no procedural errors had occurred that would warrant a reversal of the decision.

As a result, the court upheld the conviction against Patrick Stanley Daley. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and the legal framework applied during the trial. Justice ESTCOURT's judgment reaffirmed the correctness of the conviction, and no further appeal was deemed necessary. The final order of the court was to maintain the conviction as originally rendered by the lower court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established