Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 13 August 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 163


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 13 AUGUST 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link

to Cameron Street, Launceston

JAR 

For Application

David John Eaton

v

State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

KT

(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m. not before 4:00 p.m.

For Sentence

KLL

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.

For Sentence

Danny Ian Cheeseman

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Nicholas Robin Clark

Jordan Mark O’Brien

Final Witness Notices

For Bail Consent

Jamian Osbourne Burden

For Trial

Christopher Lewis Emery

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Acting Justice PORTER

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via Video Link

to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Liam Thomas Ransley

Stephen Charles Mundy

For Sentence

Kye Scott James

For Bail Application

James Michael Fitzgerald

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

9:30 am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 am

Miscellaneous Civil business

12 Noon

Miscellaneous Civil business

2:15pm

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

MGR

(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via video link

to Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie

Nicholas Michael Butcher

For Bail Application

Montana Pyke

(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Acting Justice PORTER

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via Video Link

from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Liam Thomas Ransley

Stephen Charles Mundy

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:00a.m.

For Remittal

Jason Reed

To Follow

For Trial

AGM

4:15p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Corey Douglas Ryan

4:00p.m.

For Sentence

Craig Andrew Norton

4:15p.m.

For Directions Hearing by Video Link

to Cameron Street, Launceston

Aland Clenton Storay

Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via video link

from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Nicholas Michael Butcher

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 13 August 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 163
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 163
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the parties David John Eaton and the State of Tasmania appeared before Justice Wood for a criminal matter. The nature of the dispute involved an application by Eaton against the State of Tasmania, and the court was required to address this application in its proceedings.

The legal issues before the court involved interpreting the application submitted by Eaton and determining the appropriate legal response or remedy in light of the State's obligations and the relevant legal frameworks. Justice Wood had to consider the specifics of the application, the evidence presented, and applicable laws to reach a decision.

Justice Wood meticulously evaluated the application, weighing the legal arguments and evidence. The court found that the application did not meet the necessary criteria to warrant a favourable outcome for Eaton. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the court outlined its reasoning in detail to ensure transparency and adherence to legal standards. This decision was communicated to the parties, and no further orders were issued in relation to this matter.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.