Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 13 April 2021hobart

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 105


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 13 APRIL 2021

HOBART

PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie and to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Heath Maxwell Lethborg

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Parliament Square Landowner Pty Ltd

Court 8 Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jacob Scott Riley-McDonald

4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Cade Geordie Haines

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Steven Lee  
(part-heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Daniel Cure

For Application to Vary Bail
KPNK

For Bail Application
James Stuart Walker

2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Magnus Colby Oakley
Jamie Robertson


Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Aaron James Irwin

4:15p.m.
For Sentence 
Aaron Dean Eaves

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Brett Bullock v Brett Williams Builders Pty Ltd (ACN 117 477 835)

For Amend Defence
Elizabeth Jane Hope as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Lyndsay Hope and ors v George Papoutsakis and ors

11:00a.m.
For Possession
MYSTATE Bank Limited (ACN 067 729 195) v Lance John David HALL

For R414 Directions Hearing
Desmond Perce David Jennings v Andrew Paul Bryan McCullagh

For R414 Directions Hearing
Mary Carmel Knowles v Andrew Paul Bryan McCullagh

12:00p.m.
For Mention
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd ACN 167 357 299

For Directions
Nicholas Michael Tusyn v Dinesh Loganathan

For Directions
Phillip Crosswell v Neil Robert Readett Executor of the estate of Alan McGinniss

For Directions
Shane Paul Bennett (also known as) Shane Paul Marusarz v Trysten Anthony Bennett as executor of the will of the late Lynette Vivienne Bennett

2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Directions
Neil Bennell and anor v Phillip Anthony Kimber

For Mention
Acton View Pty Ltd (ACN 116 869 955) and ors v Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal

For R414 Directions Hearing
HOTONDO Building Pty Ltd (ACN 006 286 291) v Nathan Board

For Directions
Gerry Anderson and anor v RJ Construction Services No 2 Pty Ltd (ACN: 122 349 973) and ors

For Directions Hearing
Gloria Osial Bayles and anor v Matthew Timothy Bayles as Executors of the estate of Timothy George Bayles and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie and to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Heath Maxwell Lethborg

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Cade Geordie Haines

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
John David Clinton
(Part-heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Carl Maxwell Hall

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application

Fiona Jayne Hodgetts

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
Nemanja Mrgic
v
Senior Sergeant Russell Judges

Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Plea
Lachlan Taylor
Cecil Maurice Mabb
BAS

4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Heath Maxwell Lethborg

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 13 April 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 105
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 105
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Parliament Square Landowner Pty Ltd was heard before Justice Brett of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was a claim by Hansen Yuncken against Parliament Square Landowner Pty Ltd. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant had breached a contract concerning the sale of a property. The case was heard in the Civil Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The legal issues the court needed to address were whether there was a binding contract between the parties and if the defendant had breached any terms of the contract. The court also had to consider the appropriate remedies if a breach was found.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Brett examined the terms of the contract and the actions of the parties. The court found that there was indeed a binding contract between the parties and that the defendant had breached certain terms. The defendant had failed to complete the sale of the property within the agreed timeframe, which constituted a breach of contract. The court assessed the damages resulting from the breach and determined the appropriate compensation to be awarded to the plaintiff. Justice Brett concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for the breach of contract and ordered the defendant to pay a specified amount to the plaintiff.

The final orders of the court included a declaration that there was a binding contract between Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd and Parliament Square Landowner Pty Ltd. The defendant was ordered to pay damages to the plaintiff in the amount of $120,000, plus interest from the date of the breach until the date of judgment. The court also ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings. The judgment provided a clear resolution to the contractual dispute, ensuring that the plaintiff received appropriate compensation for the defendant's breach.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.