LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2016
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jane Ellen Gluschke
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Trent Aaron Gordon
For Bail Variation
Jesse Rick Littlejohn
For Legal Argument
Brent Anthony Cordwell
For Trial
Kellan Daniel Stewart Moran
(empanelment only)
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Shannon Douglas Gee
Renee Paula Trojan
Court 8, Salamanca Place
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Michael John Dale
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
TGW
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Brendan Lee Jones
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by Video-Link
Michael John Cowie
To Follow
For Trial
Jason Edward Richards
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm For Bail Application
Anthony Wayne Slade
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Trial
Graham John Ennis
For Plea
Brady Christopher Oates
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application by video link
Keith Wayne Woods
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Brendan Lee Jones
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 11 October 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 217
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 217
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and any evidence presented in mitigation or aggravation. The court also considered the principles of justice and deterrence in determining the appropriate sentence. After carefully weighing all the relevant factors, the court imposed a sentence on the defendant, which was deemed to be proportionate to the seriousness of the offence and in the best interests of the community.
The final orders of the court were that the defendant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, with specific details regarding the length of the sentence and any other conditions or requirements imposed by the court. The defendant was also ordered to pay any applicable fines or costs associated with the proceedings. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legal issues and relevant factors, and was intended to serve the interests of justice and public safety.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.