Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 10 November 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1109


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 10 NOVEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Neil Plummer
v
Lakshimi Sundram

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Carl Karl Richard Burman-Farrell
v
State of Tasmania

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing
Mark Anthony Bell v State of Tasmania

4:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Jack Daniels McKenzie
(Part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Kyle Richard Dupree

For Facts and Sentence
BJB

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m
For Sentence
Dillon John Cruse

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew John Davey

For Directions Hearing
ABM

For Sentencing Submissions
Joshua Blair Read

For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Rad John Lumley-Pearsall

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Susan Maree Cochrane atf Bungaree Trust and anor v Dieter Helbig and anor

For Application for Admission
Olumayowa Alukorede Adesanya

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Konrad Peter Plachta as Administrator of the Estate of the Late Bettina Fairbarn v Nicholas Lachlan Fairbarn and ors

For Directions Hearing
Maureen Grace Dawes v Anne Maree Fisher as Executors of the Estate of Leonard John Fisher and ors

For Directions Hearing
Deborah Jane Smith

2:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stephen David Booth and anor v Andrew Mark Booth as Executor of the Estate of Elaine Faith Booth

3:00p.m. via Skype
For Directions Hearing
Tasco 1 Pty Ltd and anor v Caeg Holdings Pty Ltd t/as Graham Woodhouse Conveyancing and ors

For Directions Hearing
Denise Parker v Dr Stephen Wilkinson and anor

For Directions Hearing
Bianca Rock v John Soloduch

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Michael Peter Lee James Blake
Daniel James Crisp

For Trial
Christopher Brendan Keil

4:15p.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Mathew Leigh Coates

For Plea
Benjamin Scott Parry

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 2, Hobart
Jack Daniels McKenzie
(Part-heard)

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 10 November 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 1109
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 1109
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Neil Plummer was the plaintiff in a case against Lakshmi Sundram, heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the provided excerpt. The Court of Criminal Appeal heard a case involving Carl Karl Richard Burman-Farrell against the State of Tasmania. The legal issues in this case were not outlined in the excerpt. Further down the list, the court dealt with several criminal matters, including bail applications, sentencing submissions, and directions hearings, all within its criminal jurisdiction.

The legal issues addressed in these cases varied but generally included considerations of bail eligibility, sentencing principles, procedural directions, and the admissibility of applications. The court had to interpret and apply relevant statutes, case law, and legal principles to resolve these issues. The reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided excerpt.

The final orders of the court were not specified in the excerpt, so the outcomes of the cases are not known. The court would have made decisions based on the evidence presented, legal arguments, and relevant legal principles. The outcomes would have been communicated to the parties involved in each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.