LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 10 JULY 2018
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video Link
NMM
For Facts and Sentence
Christopher David Jenkins
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 10 July 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 450
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 450
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court needed to address involved the procedural aspects of sentencing in criminal cases, including the appropriate steps to be taken in light of the facts presented. The court had to consider the nature of the offence, the relevant sentencing principles, and any mitigating or aggravating factors that might influence the final sentence. The primary focus was on ensuring that the sentencing process adhered to legal standards and principles.
Justice Brett, after considering the submissions and the relevant legal framework, ruled on the procedural steps to be followed in Jenkins’ sentencing. The court decided that specific evidence and submissions needed to be presented, and outlined a timeline for these to be completed. The reasoning was grounded in the need to ensure a fair and just sentencing process that complied with statutory and common law requirements. The outcome was that the court provided clear directions for the next steps in the sentencing process, aiming to expedite the matter in a manner that was fair to both parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.