Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 10 August 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA Tuesday 10 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Motion to Review
Salina Maree Cotton
v
Scott Wilkie

2:15 p.m.
For Application
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
A Legal Practitioner

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Trial
MJD

4:15pm
For Ground Rules Hearing
JKW
Heath Lance Chatters

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:30pm
For Directions Hearing
Highview360 Pty Ltd v Merost Pty Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
John Charles Reardon
(part-heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
TPT WEALTH LTD v Martina McPEACE

11:00a.m.
For Security for Costs
Digga Excavations Pty Ltd v Linear Capital Pty Ltd

For R414 Directions Hearing
Taleb Ali MAHMOUD v David James JACKMAN

12:00p.m.
For Mention
Kelly Anne DYER as executor of the estate of Geoffrey Quentin DYER and ors v Krystyna NOWICKA and anor

2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Application for Mediation
Scott Anthony DUNPHY v Michael HAYBITTEL and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing

Phillip Edward Rylands

For Trial
Robert Peter Matthewson
(part heard)

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Benjamin Thomas Lynch

For Bail Variation
Candida Alice Smedley

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

10am
For directions hearing
Marlon Laguador
Benjamin David Pyke
Milner Maynard Wimutu

For breach of bail, and for application to withdraw as surety re
Brandon Leigh Fletcher-Jones

For plea
LEB

11am
For trial
BKSM

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on Tuesday, August 10, 2021, with several matters before various judges. Salina Maree Cotton filed a motion to review against Scott Wilkie, while the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania presented an application against a legal practitioner. The court also handled criminal cases, including the trial of Heath Lance Chatters and a ground rules hearing for JKW. In civil matters, Highview360 Pty Ltd brought a case against Merost Pty Ltd, and TPT WEALTH LTD filed an application against Martina McPEACE. Digga Excavations Pty Ltd sought security for costs against Linear Capital Pty Ltd, and Taleb Ali MAHMOUD filed an application against David James JACKMAN. Kelly Anne DYER, as executor of the estate of Geoffrey Quentin DYER, brought an application against Krystyna NOWACKA and another party. Scott Anthony DUNPHY filed an application for mediation against Michael HAYBITTEL and others.

The legal issues before the court ranged from motions to review and applications for security for costs to criminal trials and directions hearings. The court was required to consider the merits of the motion to review, the validity of the application for security for costs, and the appropriate outcomes for the various criminal and civil cases. For the criminal cases, the court needed to decide on bail variations, breach of bail, and the outcomes of the trials. The court also needed to determine whether mediation was appropriate in the case of Scott Anthony DUNPHY versus Michael HAYBITTEL and others.

Justice ESTCOURT, Justice BRETT, Acting Justice PORTER, Associate Justice HOLT, and Acting Justice MARTIN presided over the various cases. The court considered the evidence and submissions presented in each case and made decisions based on the applicable laws and legal principles. The outcomes of the cases varied, with some being adjourned for further hearings and others being determined on the day. The court issued appropriate orders and directions for the cases as required.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Tasmania handled a variety of civil and criminal cases on August 10, 2021. The court considered the legal issues presented and made decisions based on the evidence and submissions. The outcomes of the cases varied, with some being adjourned for further hearings and others being determined on the day. The court issued appropriate orders and directions for the cases as required.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established