Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 1 September 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 1 SEPTEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Jury Empanelment
Brett Knox

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m
S C

For Bail Application via video-link
Nicholas Peter Street

4:30 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link
Chelsea Ellen Camino

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joshua Blair Read

For Plea
Nicholas John Barrett

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions
Shannon James Duffy

4:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Peter Gary Farrow

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
12:00p.m.
For Mention/Originating Application
Wayne Ward v Kylie Anne Farrell

2:15p.m.
For Mention – First Defendant’s Interlocutory Application
Bulk Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Donald Moylan as Trustee for the Colledge Moylan Family Trust Trading as Thermal Logic and anor

For Mention – Originating Application
Peter Royston Worrall as legal personal representative of the estate of Chandra Kanta Kumar v Rajesh Jiwan as legal personal representative of the estate of Chandra Kanta Kumar and ors

For Directions Hearing
Michelle Christine Nellis v Darren Richard Taylor and ors

For Strike Out Defence and Counterclaim/ Set Down for Trial
Paul Glover as Trustee of the Glover Family Trust trading as Glover Electric v Rossglengary Pty Ltd

3:00p.m.
By Skype
For Directions Hearing
Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Ltd v John Dourias as Trustee of the 60 Barossa Family Trust

For Set Aside Judgment/Dismiss Action
Jason Lee Ronksley and anor v French’s Building Services Pty Ltd and ors

For Originating Application
Selina Rush v Motor Accidents Insurance Board and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Benjamin Andrew Stebbeings

4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
AJP

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentencing Submissions via video link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Peter Gary Farrow

BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a variety of cases were listed for hearing, reflecting both criminal and civil matters. Notably, several criminal cases were scheduled, including an empanelment of a jury for a case involving Brett Knox, bail applications for Nicholas Peter Street and Chelsea Ellen Camino, and sentencing submissions for Shannon James Duffy and Peter Gary Farrow. Additionally, there were civil cases involving matters such as an originating application by Wayne Ward against Kylie Anne Farrell, a directions hearing for Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Ltd against John Dourias, and a set aside judgment application by Jason Lee Ronksley and another against French’s Building Services Pty Ltd and others.

The legal issues presented in these cases varied widely, encompassing criminal charges, bail applications, sentencing submissions, and civil disputes such as trust disputes, estate matters, and contractual obligations. Each case required the court to address specific legal principles pertinent to the nature of the proceedings, including the assessment of bail, the interpretation of statutory provisions, and the application of common law principles to the facts of each case.

The court's reasoning and outcome would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case. For instance, in criminal cases, the court would consider the severity of the offence, the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court if released on bail, and the principles of justice and public safety. In civil matters, the court would evaluate the merits of the originating applications, the validity of the claims, and the application of relevant legal standards. Ultimately, the court's decisions would be guided by statutory provisions, case law, and the particular circumstances of each case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established