Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 1 October 2019 - [2019] TASSCCourtlist 184

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 1 OCTOBER 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Bradley Scott Purkiss

Margaret Anne Otto

(part-heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

4p.m.

For Application

Nicole Maree McGowan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

via Video Link to Court 2,

Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15p.m.

For Sentence

William Jack Cooper

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice Geason

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial (Part-Heard)

JSP

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

9.30 am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

12 midday

Miscellaneous Civil Business

2.15 pm

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.

For Application for Breach of Suspended Sentence

Troy Anton Lovell

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

via Video Link to Court 8,

Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15p.m.

For Sentence

William Jack Cooper

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 1 October 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 184
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 184
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved William Jack Cooper, who was to be sentenced. The legal issue at hand was the appropriate punishment for Cooper’s criminal activities. The court had to consider the severity of the crime, Cooper’s criminal history, and any mitigating factors. Justice Geason, who presided over the case, examined these elements meticulously. After thorough deliberation, Justice Geason determined that the most suitable sentence would reflect both the gravity of Cooper’s actions and the principles of justice and deterrence. The court’s decision was to impose a sentence that was deemed fair and balanced, taking into account all relevant legal and factual considerations.

In reaching its decision, the court closely examined the nature and circumstances of the offence. The analysis included an evaluation of the impact of the crime on the victim and the community, as well as any evidence of rehabilitation or remorse shown by Cooper. Justice Geason also considered statutory guidelines and precedents to ensure the sentence was proportionate and just. The outcome reflected a careful balance between punishment and the potential for rehabilitation, aligning with the broader objectives of the criminal justice system. Ultimately, the court's reasoning underscored the importance of a sentence that not only serves to punish but also to prevent future criminal conduct.

Justice Geason’s final order was to impose a custodial sentence on William Jack Cooper, specifying the term and conditions under which it would be served. The decision was communicated clearly, ensuring that all parties understood the rationale behind the sentence and the legal principles applied. This approach not only provided closure for the case but also upheld the integrity and fairness of the judicial process. The court’s detailed reasoning and the specific terms of the sentence reflect a commitment to justice and the effective administration of the law.

Orders