Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday, 1 December 2020hobart

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY, 1 DECEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m
For Directions Hearing
B T H

For Special Hearing
R H K

4:15 p.m
For First Directions Hearing
Stephanie Danielle Oakford

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Legal Profession Board v WFL
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Hayden Joel Larner
Shane Michael Palmer

For Sentencing Submissions
Hayden Dean Scott

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard
(Part-heard)

For Special Hearing
Nicholas Aaron Scott

Not before 3:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Kye John Edward Charles Louney

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Mention
Wendy Jan (Oldham) Reid v Dr Nathanael Sweeney and anor

For Directions Hearing
Natalie Anne Preshaw v Miroslaw Ryszard Kucharski

11:00a.m.
For R414 Directions Hearing
Corestaff Tas Pty Ltd v Nyrstar Hobart Pty Ltd

For Directions Hearing
Public Trustee v Webster and anor

2:15p.m.
For Mention
Kathryn Kirk v Leigh Anthony Harper and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Mark Richard Nicholas
Heath Maxwell Lethborg
Hasley James Maynard

For Trial
Ruhua Liu
Shayne Michael Murphy

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Natalie Maher
(part-heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Trial
AGM

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Tuesday, 1 December 2020, the Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of hearings across Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. In Hobart, various cases were scheduled in different courts, including a directions hearing for BTH, a special hearing for RHK, and a first directions hearing for Stephanie Danielle Oakford. The court also addressed a trial involving the Legal Profession Board versus WFL, and a directions hearing for Corestaff Tas Pty Ltd versus Nyrstar Hobart Pty Ltd. In Launceston, several criminal cases were listed for mention and trial, including cases involving Mark Richard Nicholas, Heath Maxwell Lethborg, Hasley James Maynard, Ruhua Liu, and Shayne Michael Murphy. In Burnie, a trial was scheduled for the morning session.

The court was required to consider various legal issues, including directions for ongoing cases, bail applications, and trial proceedings. For instance, in the case of the Legal Profession Board versus WFL, the court needed to determine the next steps in the legal process, while in the matter of Kye John Edward Charles Louney, the court had to consider whether to grant bail. Additionally, in the trial cases, the court would need to ensure that the proceedings were conducted fairly and in accordance with the law.

In its reasoning, the court likely addressed the procedural aspects of each case, ensuring that the legal processes were followed correctly. For example, in the bail application for Kye John Edward Charles Louney, the court would have assessed the evidence and arguments presented to determine whether bail was appropriate. In the trial cases, the court would have overseen the presentation of evidence and arguments to ensure a fair trial. The outcomes of each case would have been based on the specific legal issues presented and the evidence provided.

The final orders of the court would have been documented in the court's records, detailing the decisions made and any further directions or actions required in each case. These orders would have provided clarity on the next steps for the parties involved and ensured that the legal processes were adhered to.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established