Legal Research
Cases
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 9 July 2020

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 9 July 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 787

Jurisdiction

Appeal

Discovery & Disclosure

Civil Litigation & Procedure

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 9 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

9:15am
For Directions via video link
JCH Harvest & Haulage Pty Ltd v Joshua Harding

9:30am
For Directions via video link
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group v Tracey Anne Jefferies

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am
GLOVER, Andrew Stephen
C M B

11.30 am
WILLIAMS, Stephen James

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST

BURNIE

Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am
GLOVER, Andrew Stephen
C M B

11.30 am
WILLIAMS, Stephen James

Details

AGLC: Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 9 July 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 787
Case: [2020] TASSCCourtlist 787
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a case involving JCH Harvest & Haulage Pty Ltd and Joshua Harding. The dispute revolves around contractual obligations and potential breaches. The case was heard via video link, with the court tasked with providing directions in the matter. Another case, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group versus Tracey Anne Jefferies, was also heard on the same day via video link. This case pertains to preliminary proceedings applications.

The legal issues in the JCH Harvest & Haulage Pty Ltd case primarily concern the interpretation of the contract between the parties and whether there has been a breach of any of its terms. The court was required to decide on the admissibility of certain evidence, the scope of the contract, and the appropriate directions to be given to facilitate the resolution of the dispute. In the case of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group versus Tracey Anne Jefferies, the court had to address the preliminary applications and determine the admissibility of evidence and the procedural steps to be taken moving forward.

Justice Brett provided directions for both cases, ensuring that the procedural aspects of each case were addressed and that the court could proceed efficiently. The court outlined the next steps for both cases, including the scheduling of further hearings and the exchange of evidence. The final orders were not explicitly stated in the document but would have been communicated to the parties involved.

Orders