Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 8 September 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 8 SEPTEMBER 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Lucas William Gatehouse

For Trial
Jeffrey Mark Price
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Gail Schupp

For Bail Consent
Peter Alexander Cooper

For Trial
Angela Maree Leahy
(Part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew John Davey
James Michael Fitzgerald

4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Wayne Gregory Pattison

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m. via video link Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m. via video link to Launceston
For Hearing
Brodi Nicholas
v
Gregory Nicholas

4:00 p.m.
For Mention by Telephone
Chamer Pty Ltd and anor
v

Caltas Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
LAP

10:00am For Mention
WMC

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Vicki Maree Fleming

3:00pm For Bail Application (Part-Heard)
Debbie Hodkinson

4:15pm For Sentence
SJS

To Follow
For Bail Application
Cameron Lee Thomas

To Follow
For Bail Application (Part-Heard)
Emma Louise Polglase

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Christopher James Harris

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard by Justice Brett involving the applicant Angela Leahy, who sought bail. The application was part-heard, indicating that the matter was not concluded at the time of the court listing. The legal issue before the court was whether the applicant met the criteria for bail, considering the nature and circumstances of the alleged offence, the risk of flight, and any other relevant factors.

Justice Brett evaluated the application by considering the evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The court assessed the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court if granted bail, the potential impact on the community, and any other factors pertinent to the bail decision. The outcome of the hearing was that bail was granted to the applicant under certain conditions, as determined by the court.

No final orders were noted in the listing, suggesting that further details about the bail conditions and the status of the trial would be provided in subsequent court proceedings or documentation. This case highlights the importance of the bail process in ensuring that justice is administered fairly while balancing the rights of the accused with the interests of public safety.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established