Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 8 November 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 8 NOVEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
NTP
(Part-Heard)

4:30 p.m.
In Chambers
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Shea Alex Gibbling and Toby John Della Valle

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Cameron Scott Clark

2.15 p.m.
For Plea
Emma May Wordsworth

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Christopher Craig Banks
v
The State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15am For Trial (Part Heard)
Robert William Broad

10:00am For Preliminary Proceedings Indication
RAG

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Ricky Lee Badcock

2:15pm For Sentencing Submissions
NSD

4:15pm For Bail Application by Video Link
Courtney Hill

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing via video
link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex

Christopher Craig Banks v The State of Tasmania

Civil Jurisdiction

2:15pm For Hearing

Dannielle Tootell v Community Housing Limited

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Kim Haines
v
Cliff Martindale

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Dannielle Tootell versus Community Housing Limited was heard in the Burnie Court on November 8, 2018. The plaintiff, Dannielle Tootell, brought an action against the defendant, Community Housing Limited, which is a statutory body. The nature of the dispute appears to involve some form of civil litigation, although the specifics of the claim are not detailed in the provided excerpt. The case was presided over by Justice Geason.

The legal issues before the court were not explicitly stated in the document. However, the case's inclusion in the civil jurisdiction section suggests that it concerns a matter of private law, possibly involving contractual obligations, tort claims, or property disputes. The court's role would have been to interpret relevant statutes, case law, and facts to determine the rights and liabilities of the parties involved.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not detailed in the provided excerpt. Given that the hearing was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. and presided over by Justice Geason, it can be inferred that the court would have considered evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments from both parties before reaching a decision. The final outcome would have been communicated to the parties involved and could potentially be subject to appeal depending on the nature and significance of the decision.

No further orders or outcomes are mentioned in the provided excerpt, indicating that the case was still in progress or that the details were not available at the time of publication.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established