Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 6 July 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 6 JULY 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:45 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Mark William Eather

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence by video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Zane Andrew Henderson
Adam Cox
Peter Kopper

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jodie Lynn Parkinson
Dale Graham Parkinson

To Follow
Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Andrew John McCormack and Ors

v
Lihua Qin and Ors

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher Roy Butt
Glen John McKeown
Dale Graham Parkinson
Jodie Lynn Parkinson

For Trial
Erin Jay Tyers
(Part-Heard)

11:15 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel Richard John Reardon

For Mention
Leigh Watson Penneyston

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence by Video Link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Emma-Jo Alison Mason

For Directions Hearing
NTP

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Simon Anthony Catto

For Directions Hearing
Dion Brian Lumley
Emma May Wordsworth
Joel Maddox
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Daryl John Smart and anor

Criminal Jurisdiction
1:00 p.m.
For Decision by via video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Hendrik Dikkenberg

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Judgment

In Court as In Chambers

Gail Burnett

Fitzgerald and Browne

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
For Hearing by video link
Jeanette Cawthen, the trustee of the Property of Jeanette Greta Cawthen, A Bankrupt
v
Stewart Cawthen

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Baldico Pty Ltd
v
Coconacha Inchiban Pty Ltd

Metro Finance Pty Limited
v
Mining Sims Australia Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
John Selwyn Statton

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Andrew Neville Hodgetts

To Follow
For Sentence
Edward Richards
Andrew Yatras
Ethan Daniel Baker
Bradley John Holton-Crane
Michael Ronald Goss

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Corey Mitchell Gesler

To Follow
For Plea
David Jnr Geoffrey Furley

To Follow
For Facts and Sentence
JCP

2:15pm For Sentence by video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Zane Andrew Henderson
Adam Maxwell Cox
Peter Michael Kopper

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:00pm For Decision by via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Hendrik Dikkenberg

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jodie Lynn Parkinson
Dale Graham Parkinson

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence by Video Link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Emma-Jo Alison Mason

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

This case involved a number of hearings that took place in various courts across Tasmania on the 6th of July, 2017. The cases included both civil and criminal matters, with some hearings conducted via video link. Notable cases included a directions hearing for Mark William Eather in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, and a sentence hearing for Emma-Jo Alison Mason in the Burnie Court.

The court was required to decide on various legal issues, including directions for ongoing cases, sentencing for convicted individuals, and decisions on applications and hearings for both civil and criminal matters. The court had to ensure that all hearings were conducted in accordance with the law and that the rights of all parties involved were upheld.

The reasoning of the court was to ensure that all cases were heard in a timely and efficient manner, with particular attention given to the use of video links to facilitate hearings in remote locations. The court also had to ensure that all legal principles were applied correctly and that the outcomes of the hearings were just and fair. The outcome of the hearings varied depending on the nature of the case, with some cases resulting in further directions or sentences being handed down.

In summary, the court had to manage a range of civil and criminal cases across various locations in Tasmania, with some hearings conducted via video link. The court had to ensure that all legal principles were applied correctly and that the outcomes of the hearings were just and fair. The outcomes of the hearings varied depending on the nature of the case, with some cases resulting in further directions or sentences being handed down.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established