Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 4 February 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 4 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m
For Sentence
Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

For Directions Hearing
JAJ

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron Dean Eaves

For Trial
Jarod Lee Kringle
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Kai Kimmo Juvakka
(part-heard)

4:00p.m.
For Mention
ZHB

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Dante Mauriello
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Mention
John William Foster v John Martin Pickup and ors

For Mention
Amelia Jane Rowwe v Terrence Andrews and ors

11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Mesh & Bar Pty Limited (ACN 084 464 746)
v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
(ACN 005 357 522) and ors

2:15p.m.
For Directions
Ki Soon Kim v Hotas Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 125 522 367) and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones

For Bail Consent
Jamie Stephen Sexton

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link
from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Mention
John William Foster v John Martin Pickup and ors

For Mention
Amelia Jane Rowwe v Terrence Andrews and ors

BURNIE

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via from Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Legal Argument
E D

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved several defendants who were scheduled for various hearings, including sentencing, bail applications, and trials. The defendants included Bryer Imre Nagy, Jackson Elijah Yammi, Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon, Aaron Dean Eaves, Jarod Lee Kringle, Kai Kimmo Juvakka, Dante Mauriello, John William Foster, Amelia Jane Rowwe, Mesh & Bar Pty Limited, and Ki Soon Kim. The matters varied from criminal jurisdiction issues to civil disputes and applications for bail.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a wide range of matters. In criminal cases, the court had to decide on the appropriate sentences for defendants already found guilty, consider bail applications, and manage trials for defendants yet to be tried. In civil matters, the court was required to hear arguments and provide directions in ongoing disputes between private parties and financial institutions.

The court addressed each matter with a focus on the specific circumstances of the case. For sentencing, the court considered the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. Bail applications were assessed based on the likelihood of the defendant appearing in court if released and the risk to the community. Trials proceeded according to the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both the prosecution and defence. In civil matters, the court provided directions to manage the litigation process, ensuring that the proceedings were fair and efficient.

The final orders varied according to the nature of the case. Sentences were imposed on defendants found guilty, bail was granted or denied based on the assessment, and trials were scheduled or continued as appropriate. In civil matters, the court issued directions to manage the litigation process and scheduled further hearings as necessary.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established