Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 4 February 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 4 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m
For Sentence
Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

For Directions Hearing
JAJ

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron Dean Eaves

For Trial
Jarod Lee Kringle
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
09:30a.m.
For Trial
Kai Kimmo Juvakka
(part-heard)

4:00p.m.
For Mention
ZHB

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Dante Mauriello
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Mention
John William Foster v John Martin Pickup and ors

For Mention
Amelia Jane Rowwe v Terrence Andrews and ors

11:00a.m.
For Hearing
Mesh & Bar Pty Limited (ACN 084 464 746)
v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
(ACN 005 357 522) and ors

2:15p.m.
For Directions
Ki Soon Kim v Hotas Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 125 522 367) and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones

For Bail Consent
Jamie Stephen Sexton

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link
from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Mention
John William Foster v John Martin Pickup and ors

For Mention
Amelia Jane Rowwe v Terrence Andrews and ors

BURNIE

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via from Court 2,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Bryer Imre Nagy

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Legal Argument
E D

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved various parties and cases. These ranged from sentencing matters and bail applications to trials and hearings in both criminal and civil jurisdictions. Among the cases were those of Bryer Imre Nagy, Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield, and Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon, who were scheduled for sentencing, and Dante Mauriello, who had applied for bail. Other cases included civil disputes such as Mesh & Bar Pty Limited versus Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, and personal injury claims such as Ki Soon Kim versus Hotas Holdings Pty Ltd.

The court was required to address several legal issues. In criminal cases, these included the appropriate sentencing for defendants found guilty of various offences, as well as the merits of bail applications. The court also had to consider procedural matters in both criminal and civil cases, such as the granting of consent for bail and directions in ongoing trials. Additionally, the court needed to resolve disputes between parties in civil matters, including determining liability and damages where appropriate.

The court's reasoning and outcome varied across the different cases. Sentencing decisions were based on the severity of the offences, the circumstances of the case, and any mitigating or aggravating factors presented. Bail applications were assessed on the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court and the risk of reoffending. In civil cases, the court examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to determine liability and the appropriate remedy. The outcomes reflected the court's adherence to legal principles and the specific facts of each case.

The final orders included sentencing decisions for the defendants, with considerations for their individual circumstances, and the granting or refusal of bail. In civil matters, the court issued directions for further proceedings, determined liability, and ordered compensation where applicable. These decisions were made in accordance with the applicable laws and judicial discretion.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established