Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 30 July 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 30 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Sean William McKenzie

2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Luke David Buck

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Hayden Dale Smith

For Directions Hearing via video link
to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Samuel Jayden Paul Smith

For Bail Application via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Jayden Grant Horne

For Bail Application via video link
to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Brode Medley

For Bail Application via video link
Shayden Aaron Burgess

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings
Golafrouz Nazari

2:15p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings
Mark William Ransley

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial (part heard)
SDW

2:30pm
For Mention
Corey Leigh Milner
Neil Craig Berne

For Facts and Sentence
Nathan Luke Deckers
Tyler John Mayne
Rory Mitchell Shipton-Gaitor

For Plea
Nathan John Cosgrove
Dayne John Robertson
Georgia May Smith

For Legal Argument
KJB

4:15pm
For Bail Application
Harley Burling

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Special Hearing
TLRRDH

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of matters on 30 July 2020, involving various criminal cases. In the Hobart Court, the Chief Justice was presiding over a trial for Sean William McKenzie, and directions hearings for Luke David Buck, Hayden Dale Smith, Samuel Jayden Paul Smith, Jayden Grant Horne, and Brode Medley. There were also bail applications for Jayden Grant Horne and Brode Medley, as well as a bail application for Shayden Aaron Burgess. Associate Justice was overseeing preliminary proceedings for Golafrouz Nazari and Mark William Ransley. In Launceston, Justice Brett presided over a trial for SDW, mentions for Corey Leigh Milner, Neil Craig Berne, and facts and sentence for Nathan Luke Deckers, Tyler John Mayne, and Rory Mitchell Shipton-Gaitor. There were pleas for Nathan John Cosgrove, Dayne John Robertson, and Georgia May Smith, and a bail application for Harley Burling. In Burnie, Justice Pearce presided over a special hearing for TLRRDH.

The legal issues that the court had to decide were diverse, ranging from trial and bail applications to preliminary proceedings and directions hearings. The court had to consider the evidence presented in each case and determine the appropriate legal outcomes. In the case of bail applications, the court had to assess whether the accused met the criteria for bail and whether their release would pose a risk to the community or the accused. In the case of directions hearings, the court had to determine the next steps in the legal proceedings and ensure that the accused had legal representation.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not specified in the text, but it is likely that the court considered the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence in each case. The court would have applied the relevant legal principles and precedents to reach its decisions. The outcomes would have varied depending on the specific circumstances of each case, but the court's decisions would have been based on a fair and impartial assessment of the evidence and legal arguments.

If there were any final orders made by the court, they would have been specified in the text. However, the text only listed the cases and their status, without providing any details on the court's decisions or orders. It is possible that some cases were adjourned or postponed, or that the court made orders for bail, release, or further legal proceedings. The court's decisions would have been communicated to the parties and their legal representatives, and any relevant orders would have been documented in the court's records.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established