LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 3 NOVEMBER 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joshua Blair Read
Heath Lance Chatters
David Wilhelm Chrusciel
Tristan Jacob Hinds
For Facts and Sentence
Sean Patrick Mahoney
Dylan Roy Bramich
Robert Paul Jenkyns
Stacey Faye Cooper
For Sentencing Submissions
HLC
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
3:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Cashmore Dennis & Anor.
v
Telfer Anne Dennis and others
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Gregory Walter Brown
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Alexander Gordon Calvert
(Part-Heard)
For Mention
Klaus Dieter Nubert
Gaurav Endlay
Luke Rogers
LCB
BC
Nicholas Aaron Scott
Lewan Patrick Lehman
Matthew John Davey
Dillon Anthony Davey
Scott Raymond Dale
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Corey Matthew Kedey
Annabelle Vanessa Millhouse
Application to Review Suspended Sentence
Darren Paul Clark
For Bail Consent
Andrew John McMillan
Dylan Vincent Phillips
Sadio Mazzucca
Scott Andrew Cripps
IRF
Benjamin Lee Noyes
Arlene Maree Taylor
Emma May Wordsworth
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention via Video-Link
Nathan John Jones
To Follow
For Mention
Victoria Elizabeth Burton
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 3 November 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 239
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 239
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed various aspects of criminal law and procedure, including bail applications, sentencing submissions, and directions hearings. The court had to consider the legal arguments and evidence presented by the parties involved to make decisions on these matters. The proceedings involved multiple hearings and required the court to interpret and apply relevant laws and legal principles to arrive at its decisions.
The court, in its reasoning, evaluated the evidence and arguments presented by the parties. Justice Estcourt considered the legal frameworks applicable to each case, ensuring that the proceedings adhered to procedural fairness and justice. The outcome of the court's decisions was not explicitly detailed in the excerpt, but the cases were handled in a manner consistent with the legal standards and practices of the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The final orders, which would detail the specific outcomes of the decisions, were presumably made and documented in the court's records following the hearings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.