Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Thursday, 28 March 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 62


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 28 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
Application to Revoke Bail
Carley Anne Watkins

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
JAR

For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
and Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
CMI

For Bail Application
Luke David Buck

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie

CJW   

For Directions Hearing
TJR

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Ashton Mitchell Gill

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
JSR
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence via video link
Wayne William Howlett

For Sentencing Submissions
JRV

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Erica Helen Bennett

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
CMI

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Jayantha Kumara Dewage Don

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Nathan Coppleman

9:30 a.m.
For Trial
IBF  
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
4.15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 7 Salamanca Place, Hobart
CMI
JAR

Court 2, (Ground Floor)
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link
from court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

CJW  

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 28 March 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 62
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 62
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Carley Anne Watkins involved an application to revoke bail. The matter was heard before Chief Justice BLOW in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The central legal issue was whether the conditions of the applicant’s bail had been breached, warranting revocation. The court had to consider the circumstances under which the bail was granted, the conditions imposed, and any evidence presented that suggested the applicant had failed to comply with those conditions.

Chief Justice BLOW examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court took into account the seriousness of the alleged breach and the potential risk to the community if the applicant were to remain on bail. The analysis also included a review of the applicant’s history and the likelihood of future non-compliance. Ultimately, the court determined that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate a breach of bail conditions, and thus, the application to revoke bail was dismissed.

The court's decision was communicated clearly, outlining the reasons for its conclusion based on the evidence and applicable legal standards. The orders of the court were that the application to revoke bail was dismissed, and the applicant was to continue under the existing bail conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.