Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 27 September 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:15 a.m.
For Trial
Amir Lee
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Cain Jeremiah Dunning
v
State of Tasmania and anor

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
MDR

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Joshua Peter Edward Darling

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Christo Brown

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Reginald Cohen
Frederick James Clay
Samuel Alexander Laycock
Jack Timothy Stuart-Mitchell

10:30am For Legal Argument (Part Heard)
Robert William Broad

Civil Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Directions Hearing
Fingal Pastoral v Page Seager Lawyers

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30am For Trial
Johanne Patricia Williams v Martin John Williams & Anor.

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a part-heard trial involving Amir Lee. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly detailed in the case list, but it is listed under criminal jurisdiction, indicating it likely involves an alleged criminal offence. Meanwhile, Acting Justice Porter handled a directions hearing for Cain Jeremiah Dunning against the State of Tasmania and another party, also under criminal jurisdiction. Justice Pearce in Launceston managed a mention for Christo Brown via video link, followed by a directions hearing for Reginald Cohen, Frederick James Clay, Samuel Alexander Laycock, and Jack Timothy Stuart-Mitchell. Another case under Pearce’s jurisdiction involved Robert William Broad, scheduled for legal argument. Associate Justice Holt in Launceston presided over a trial for Johanne Patricia Williams against Martin John Williams and another party, also under civil jurisdiction.

The legal issues in these cases revolve around the procedural and substantive aspects of the respective criminal and civil proceedings. For the criminal cases, the court must determine the appropriate legal processes to follow, ensuring the rights of the defendants are upheld while progressing the state's case. The civil case likely involves the interpretation and application of civil law principles to resolve the dispute between the parties. The court's role is to interpret relevant statutes, case law, and to manage the legal proceedings effectively, ensuring a fair trial or resolution according to the law.

Justice Wood, Acting Justice Porter, and Justice Pearce each directed their respective cases towards resolution or further clarification, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal standards. The outcome of these hearings will depend on the evidence presented and the arguments made by the parties involved. Each case's progression will be guided by the court's assessment of the legal and factual issues presented. Associate Justice Holt managed the trial, ensuring that the case was heard and decided according to civil litigation principles.

The final orders for each case will be determined based on the outcomes of the hearings and trials. The court will provide detailed judgments or orders addressing the specific issues and findings in each case, ensuring clarity and legal reasoning for the parties involved. These orders will reflect the court's decisions on the merits of the cases and any procedural directives necessary for their resolution.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established