Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 25 May 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 25 MAY 2017

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Daniel Joseph Noonan
Martyn John Carpenter
Nathan Lee Wechsler
Timothy Lee King
Simon James Larritt
Joshua William Kay
Carol Cecily Foster
Melinda Kate Lucas
Joshua Paul Barrow
Danny Leigh Morgan
WGC
Michael Eddie French
Daiki Ishikawa-Browne
David Loidl O’May
Margarita Alisha Pepita Nichols
Chloe May Ross
Jamie Paul Wilmot
Kelly Raema Mundy-Page
GHM

For Facts and Sentence
Darren John Slattery

For Application for Breach of Suspended Sentence
Darren Paul Clark

11.15 a.m.
For Mention
Brayden Craig Hayes

For Bail Consent
YL
MDR
Richard Joseph Bradford

2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Darren James Barwick

For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Luke Christopher Wayne Rogers
Shannon James Duffy
Nigel Maxwell Scott
Braendon Isaac Males
Leigh Watson Penneyston
SWJ

For Mention via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Womens Prison
Rianna Rochelle Lumley
Kylie Jane Hack

For Mention via video-link to Hobart Reception Prison
Phillip Maxwell Jones

For Application to Discharge Supervision Order
Ahmed Muhyi-Aldin Eldaleh

For Bail Application
Bradley Daniel Ford
David Sabbioni

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Andrew John McMillan

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Shane Mark Ivey
Shadi Farhat

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Hearing
Connector Park Pty Ltd v RV Pty Limited

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of criminal cases on Thursday, 25 May 2017. The matters ranged from mentions and bail applications to sentencing and trials. Notable cases included the mention of multiple defendants for breaches of suspended sentences, bail applications, and the continuation of a trial for an alleged crime. The court was also set to hear an application for discharge of a supervision order and a civil matter concerning Connector Park Pty Ltd v RV Pty Limited.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the interpretation and enforcement of sentencing orders, the criteria for granting bail, the procedural fairness in the handling of suspended sentences, and the rights of parties in a civil dispute. The court had to determine whether the defendants had indeed breached their suspended sentences, whether the applicants met the criteria for bail, and whether procedural errors occurred in the handling of the suspended sentences. Additionally, the court needed to decide on the merits of the civil case concerning the property dispute.

The reasoning of the court was not provided in detail, but the outcomes of the hearings would have been based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal standards. The court likely assessed the credibility of the evidence, the adherence to procedural fairness, and the specific legal principles governing each type of case. The final orders would have varied depending on the nature of the case, but could include decisions on bail, sentence modifications, or civil judgments.

The final orders of the court would have been communicated to the parties involved and would reflect the outcomes of each individual case, whether that be the granting or denial of bail, the confirmation or modification of sentences, or the resolution of the civil dispute. The court's decisions would have been based on a comprehensive review of the presented evidence and legal arguments.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established