Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 24 November 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 24 NOVEMBER 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
TGW

For Bail Application
Zach James Muir-Bennett

For Trial
Wayne Gregory Pattison
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video-link

Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser

State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Corey Graeme Farr
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Application to Vary Bail
Joseph Edward Auton

To Follow
In the Matter of an Application by SF

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Brett

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Bail Consent
Alanya Joy White

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the court heard two significant cases on 24 November 2016. The first case involved a bail application for TGW, whose full name cannot be disclosed due to legal restrictions. The second case was a directions hearing for Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser against the State of Tasmania. Both cases were presided over by Justice Tennent in Hobart.

The legal issues in these cases revolved around the bail application and procedural directions. In the bail application, the court needed to determine whether TGW qualified for bail under the relevant legislation, considering the circumstances of the case and the potential risks involved. In the directions hearing, the court was required to outline the procedural steps moving forward, ensuring that the case would progress efficiently and fairly.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided excerpt. However, it is likely that the court considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties before making its decisions. The court's approach would have been guided by the principles of justice and the specific legal frameworks governing bail and procedural directions.

No final orders were stated in the excerpt. The outcomes of these cases would depend on the court's specific findings and the legal principles applied.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established