Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 22 June 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 22 JUNE 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Trent Leon White
David John Eaton
Tyler Causon

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel Jacob Hansen
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by Video Link
Simon Anthony Catto

For Directions Hearing
Mark James Rutherford
Annalise Bender
BGB
DBL

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Beven Walker Dwyer
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Rebecca Jane Catto

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Discovery
Roberts Limited
v
Sanders Frith-Brown

2:15 p.m.
Injunction
Hobart Assets Pty Ltd
v
65 Murray Street Holdings Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
E Kalis Properties Pty Ltd as Trustee for E & R Kalis Famiy Trust
v
Robert Berry

4:15 p.m.
Direction Hearing by Telephone
Santino Di Tommaso and anor
v
Treena Bradshaw and anor

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Ricky Lee Smith-Towns

To Follow
For Facts and Sentence
Zane Andrew Henderson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Benjamin Shane Moran

4:15pm
For Sentence
Aaron Paul Wilton
Debra Willis Sherriff
Trent Bissett

To Follow
For Mention (Bail Application)
Rebecca Janice Marie Cordwell

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Roberts Limited commenced proceedings against Sanders Frith-Brown, seeking a range of relief including discovery of documents, an injunction, and damages for breach of contract. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Associate Justice Holt. The central legal issues for the court to determine were the scope of discovery, the appropriateness of an interlocutory injunction, and the quantum of damages for breach of contract.

The court considered the nature and extent of the documents sought by Roberts Limited and whether the discovery requests were appropriate. In granting the discovery, the court noted the importance of transparency and the need for both parties to have access to relevant information. Regarding the injunction, the court assessed the likelihood of irreparable harm if the injunction was not granted. Ultimately, the court found that an injunction was necessary to prevent further breaches and protect Roberts Limited's interests. The court also deliberated on the evidence presented regarding the breach of contract and the resulting damages. After evaluating the submissions and evidence, the court awarded damages to Roberts Limited.

The final orders of the court included granting discovery of specified documents, issuing an interlocutory injunction against Sanders Frith-Brown, and awarding damages to Roberts Limited. The court's decision provided clarity on the scope of relief available in the case and set out the terms under which the injunction would operate, thereby providing Roberts Limited with the necessary protections and remedies.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established