Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 19 November 2020hobart

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 19 NOVEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Deryck John Lockwood

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Hossain Ali Ashrafi
Fatima Ayoubi

For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Bruce Boyer

For Determination of Application via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Drew Alexander Jones

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence
Joshua Blair Read

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Christopher James Bennett

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Luke Frans Bezemer
(part-heard)

Conference room, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie and Ron Barwick Prison
Kurt Johnhill Richardson

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Bruce Boyer

For Determination of Application via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Drew Alexander Jones

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Christopher James Bennett

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Witness on Final Notice
Sarah Jane Hall

2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Hobart
Deryck John Lockwood

3:30 p.m.
For Breach Application via video-link to Launceston Prison Complex
JGM

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Zebb Mathew Waxman
Samuel John Johnson

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Conference room, Cameron Street, Launceston and Ron Barwick Prison
Kurt Johnhill Richardson

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a dispute concerning the appropriate sentence for a defendant, Deryck John Lockwood, who appeared for a mention via video-link from Burnie. The court was tasked with determining the correct penalty for Lockwood’s criminal activities. Justice PEARCE presided over the proceedings, which took place at 4:15 PM in Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues at hand centred on the principles of sentencing and the appropriate application of penalties in light of Lockwood's criminal record and the specific nature of the offence committed. The court needed to balance various factors, including the severity of the crime, the offender's previous convictions, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Additionally, the court had to ensure that the sentence was proportionate and in line with legal precedents.

Justice PEARCE considered the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence, along with any relevant statutory guidelines and case law. After a thorough analysis, the court decided on a sentence that reflected the seriousness of the offence while taking into account the defendant's personal circumstances. The reasoning focused on achieving a balance between punishment and rehabilitation, with a detailed justification provided for the chosen penalty.

The final orders included a sentence that was deemed appropriate by the court, ensuring that it adhered to the principles of justice and proportionality. The decision was communicated clearly, providing Lockwood with a definitive understanding of his legal standing and the consequences of his actions.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established