Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 18 February 2021hobartÂ

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 41


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 18 FEBRUARY 2021

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Protected Witness Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Zachary Nathaniel Galpin


10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Rachelle Maree O’Brien


4:00 p.m.
For Application to Review an Order
Garry James Brodie


For Bail Application
Tory Ross Rose

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Benjamin Charles Bannister
(Part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Sentencing Submissions
Andrew Brett Bell

2:15pm
For Bail Application
Daniel Cure
(Part-heard)

4:15pm
For Decision
TRJ

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For R415 Directions Hearing
Rodney Charles SMART v LAUNCESTON CITY COUNCIL

For Directions Hearing
Simon a’CAMPO v Simon FULLBROOK

For Directions Hearing
Estate of the Late Robert Philip Jones: Jodie JONES v Bradley Robert JONES

For Directions Hearing
Valerie Ann WHITTET v Diamando TAMBLYN and anor

For Mention
Mark Daniel DELPHINE v Jason JONES

11:30a.m.
For Directions
FIRSTMAC FIDUCIARY SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 105 052 515) v John DOURIAS AS TRUSTEE OF THE 60 BAROSSA FAMILY TRUST and ors

2:15p.m.
For Hearing
BULK FROZEN FOODS PTY LTD v Donald MOYLAN as Trustee for THE COLLEDGE MOYLAN FAMILY TRUST Trading as THERMAL LOGIC and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Alan Rex Jones
(part-heard)

10:00am
For Directions Hearing
Mark Richard Nicholas

For Bail Consent
Jeffrey Robert Anderson

4:15pm
For Application
Patrick Charles Curbishley



Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via MS Teams and video link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For R415 Directions Hearing
Rodney Charles SMART v LAUNCESTON CITY COUNCIL

For Directions Hearing
Simon a’CAMPO v Simon FULLBROOK

For Directions Hearing
Estate of the Late Robert Philip Jones: Jodie JONES v Bradley Robert JONES

For Directions Hearing
Valerie Ann WHITTET v Diamando TAMBLYN and anor

For Mention
Mark Daniel DELPHINE v Jason JONES


BURNIE

Protected Witness Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 7, Supreme Court, Hobart
Zachary Nathaniel Galpin

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
RAS
(part-heard)

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Nemanja Mrgic

By Bail Application via video-link to Launceston Reception Prison
Shannon McLean

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 18 February 2021hobart [2021] TASSCCourtlist 41
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 41
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Estcourt presided over a bail application for Zachary Nathaniel Galpin, who was facing criminal charges. The matter was heard via video link from the Protected Witness Room in Burnie to Court 7 in Hobart. The primary legal issue before the court was whether Galpin was eligible for bail, considering the nature and seriousness of the charges against him, as well as the risk of flight and any danger he might pose to the community if released. Justice Estcourt carefully considered the evidence presented and arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. Ultimately, the court denied bail, finding that the charges were serious and that there was a significant risk that Galpin would reoffend if released.

The court's reasoning hinged on several key factors. Firstly, the gravity of the charges, which included allegations of violence and potential harm to others, weighed heavily in favour of denying bail. Secondly, the court found that there was a real risk that Galpin would not appear for his trial if granted bail, given his previous history of failing to comply with court orders. Finally, the potential danger to the community was considered significant, particularly given the nature of the alleged offences. The decision was based on a thorough assessment of the evidence and the applicable legal principles governing bail applications in serious criminal cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.