Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 16 July 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 16 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application by video-link to Mary Hutchins Womens Prison
Emma-Lisa Eronen

11:00 a.m.
For Bail Application by video-link to Launceston Reception Prison and to Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
KJD
(Part-heard)

For Bail Application by video-link to Mary Hutchins Womens Prison and to Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
Kelsey Maree Ford

2:00 p.m.
For Bail Application by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley John Holton-Crane

Not before 2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Sean Patrick Mahoney

3:00p.m.
For Bail Variation by video-link to Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kerrie-Anne George

For Bail Application by video-link to Supreme Court, Cameron Street Launceston and to Risdon Prison Complex
Christopher Ernest Denman

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am
ARJ
Rowan HUME

2.15 pm
S J H

LAUNCESTON

Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

3:00p.m.

For Bail Variation by video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kerrie-Anne George

For Bail Application by video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Risdon Prison Complex
Christopher Ernest Denman

BURNIE

Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

11:00 a.m.

For Bail Application by video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Launceston Reception Prison
KJD
(Part-heard)

For Bail Application by video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Mary Hutchins Womens Prison
Kelsey Maree Ford

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a series of bail applications heard in various locations across Tasmania, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, on July 16, 2020. The applications were heard by Justice Brett, Associate Justice Holt, and other judicial officers, and the applicants were inmates at various correctional facilities. The primary legal issue for the court was to determine whether the applicants met the criteria for bail under the Bail Act, considering the nature and circumstances of the offences, the risk of flight, and the safety of the community.

The court examined each application on its merits, taking into account the individual circumstances of each applicant, such as the seriousness of the charges, the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court if released, and any potential danger to the community if bail was granted. The court also considered evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defence, including character references and any mitigating factors. The reasoning of the court was guided by established legal principles and relevant statutory provisions, ensuring that the decision-making process was fair and balanced.

The outcome of the hearings varied, with some applications being granted, and others being refused. The court provided detailed reasons for its decisions, outlining the factors that influenced its judgment in each case. The orders made by the court reflected the findings of the individual hearings, with some applicants being granted bail subject to certain conditions, while others remained in custody pending further court appearances.

The final orders of the court were specific to each case and included conditions such as electronic monitoring, reporting requirements, and restrictions on movement. The court also made clear that any breach of bail conditions could result in the revocation of bail and further legal consequences for the applicants.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established