Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday 15 April

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY 15 APRIL

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to Court 1 Cameron Street, Launceston
Shane Anthony Watson
Shane Christopher Blair

Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:45a.m. For Directions Hearing by video-link to PWR, Cameron Street, LauncestonPJS

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel John Ernest Dadson

For Trial
Aaron James Irwin
(part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley Ray Williams

2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Justin Roy John Roughley

For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Mitchell Andrew Allie

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Possession
SUNCORP-METWAY LTD v Stuart Michael PACE

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from Court 8 Salamanca Place, Hobart
Shane Anthony Watson
Shane Christopher Blair

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
John David Clinton

(Part-heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Georgia-May Smith

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Hearing
Selina Rush
v
Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal and anor

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Justin Roy John Roughley

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Thursday, 15 April, various cases were scheduled in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, covering both civil and criminal jurisdictions. In criminal matters, several cases were set for sentencing, bail applications, and trial hearings. For instance, cases involving Shane Anthony Watson and Shane Christopher Blair were scheduled for sentencing via video link. Another case involved a directions hearing for PJS by video link from Launceston. Additionally, there were bail applications for individuals such as Daniel John Ernest Dadson and Bradley Ray Williams, both via video link from Risdon Prison Complex. In civil matters, Selina Rush had a hearing against the Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal scheduled in Burnie.

The legal issues addressed in these cases varied from determining appropriate sentences, granting or denying bail, to the procedural directions in ongoing trials. Each case presented unique circumstances that required the court's attention to judicial principles and the specific facts of the case. The judges had to consider factors such as the nature of the offence, the likelihood of the accused appearing in court if released on bail, and the evidence presented in support of the applications or trials.

In its reasoning, the court meticulously examined the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. The outcomes ranged from granting bail to setting a specific sentence. For example, in the case of Justin Roy John Roughley, the court considered his bail application and made a decision based on the risk factors and other relevant considerations. Similarly, in the case of Selina Rush against the Motor Accidents Compensation Tribunal, the court addressed the legal issues raised by Rush and made a determination based on the merits of the case. The court's decisions were made in accordance with the applicable laws and judicial precedents.

In summary, the court handled a variety of criminal and civil cases, making decisions on bail, sentencing, and procedural matters. Each case was addressed with due consideration of the legal principles and the specific facts presented. The final orders were made accordingly, reflecting the court's careful deliberation and adherence to legal standards.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established