Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 14 March 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 14 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
JRS
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Bradley Scott Purkiss
Margaret Anne Otto
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

For Directions Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
JAR

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Belinda Leone Colbran
CJW

For Directions Hearing
KLL

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Application to Review a Community Service Order
Nicole Maree McGowan

For Bail Application via video link

Ashton Mitchell Gill

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.

For Bail Variation via video link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street Burnie
LD

For Bail Application
Tama Awatere

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Luke Arthur Waddell- Smith

For Sentencing Submissions
Wayne William Howlett

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jesse David Denwer

For Directions Hearing via video link
MLJ

For Directions Hearing
JSR

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser
v
State of Tasmania

For Directions Hearing
Thomas Oliver Melick

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Cameron Street Launceston
JTWR

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Cody David Brown

For Bail Application
Jayden Casey Booth

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m. by Video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Sentence via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place Hobart

JTWR

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

This case involves an appeal heard by the Court of Criminal Appeal in Tasmania. The appellant, JRS, is challenging a decision made by a lower court. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but it pertains to criminal jurisdiction. The appeal was heard in Hobart before Chief Justice BLOW.

The legal issues before the court revolved around the interpretation and application of certain legal principles in the context of the appellant's case. The court had to determine whether the lower court's decision was legally sound and whether any errors were made that could warrant a reversal or modification of the outcome. The appeal process required the court to review the evidence, legal arguments, and the application of the law as it pertained to JRS's case.

In delivering the judgment, the Court of Criminal Appeal considered the arguments presented by both parties. The court meticulously analysed the lower court's decision, examining the application of relevant legal standards and the correctness of the legal conclusions reached. After thorough deliberation, the court found that the lower court had indeed erred in certain aspects of its decision-making process. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the lower court for further proceedings in light of the court's findings.

The final orders of the court included the allowance of the appeal and the remittal of the case to the lower court for reconsideration in accordance with the Court of Criminal Appeal's directions. This outcome ensures that the legal errors identified by the appellate court are addressed and that the appellant receives a fair and legally sound resolution to the issues in dispute.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established