Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 13, September 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 13, SEPTEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Eleni Koulmandas

2:45 p.m.
For Sentence
Troy Kane Wordsworth

4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Amir Lee

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing

Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daryl Royston Wayne Cook
Part Heard

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Emilia Olive Harwood

For Bail Application
Joshua Robin Oakley
Tony Matthew White

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing via video link to
Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie

Lynette Carol Ferguson
v
Belinda Jane Hoare

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m. Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing via Telephone
John Raymond Downham
v
John Doerr Marshall

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm For Bail Application
Christopher Geoffrey Johnston

4:15pm For Sentence
RRS

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Launceston Reception Prison
Troy Andrew Martin

For Directions Hearing
Bradley Leslie Youd

For Mention
JGM

For Facts and Sentence
Dennis James Cashman
Stuart Russell Day
WCG

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
SDH
Gerard Caleb McDermott

For Bail Consent
Adrianne Lee Baugh

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Bradley John Upton
JRS

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Variation
Adye John Wells

Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

2:15 p.m.

For Hearing via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Lynette Carol Ferguson
v

Belinda Jane Hoare

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a hearing before Justice Brett in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, concerning a civil matter. The matter was heard via video link from another court location, specifically from Burnie. The proceedings were part of a case between Lynette Carol Ferguson and Belinda Jane Hoare. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly detailed in the text, but it was a hearing in a civil matter, likely involving some form of litigation or dispute resolution between the parties.

The legal issues before the court were not explicitly outlined in the text. However, given that this was a civil hearing, the issues could have pertained to a variety of matters, such as contractual disputes, property disputes, personal injury claims, or other civil law matters. The court's role was to hear evidence, apply relevant legal principles, and make a decision based on the facts and law presented.

Justice Brett presided over the hearing and made a decision based on the evidence and arguments presented. The outcome of the hearing was not specified in the text, but it is noted that the hearing was conducted via video link, indicating a remote participation element. The court's reasoning and the final decision would have been detailed in the court's written reasons, which are not provided in the text.

No final orders were specified in the text. The outcome of the hearing would have been communicated through the court's written reasons, which are not provided here. The parties would have been informed of the court's decision and any orders made as a result of the hearing.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established