Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 13 February 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 74


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 13 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Bilal Moutwari(part-heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Damian John Lipscombe
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45a.m.
For Decision via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street,
Launceston and PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Lee Anthony Shaw
v
Beverley Joyce Hanlon

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Darrel George Harington

4:15p.m.
For Bail Consent
Saxon John Horton
Mark Gordon Bird

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Shawn Thomas
v
CGU Workers Compensation

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart By Video Link
to Court 2 Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15 am
Darren Martello v Dorset Council
Directions hearing re Orders

Jemma Barker v BIS Industries Limited ABN 13125202253
Directions Hearing – Orders

Anthony Saunders v Edward Grant Simmons
Directions Hearing

9:30am
Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Matthew Alexander Hill
Possession

Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Kathryn Veronica Cornelius
Possession

Commonwealth Bank Of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Luis Bolini Steel
Possession

Commonwealth Bank Of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Marcus Theo Hairon
Possession

Court 3 Salamanca Place, Hobart
12 Noon
Carol Margaret Rees (in their capacity as Executor of the Estate of Shirley Joan Maraldo) v Carol Margaret Rees
Hearing – Originating Application

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Trial
Lisa Maree Doolan
(Part-heard)

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Adam Roy Triffett
Ricky Damien Brown

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Judgment
Troy Wayne Murray
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45a.m.
For Decision via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Lee Anthony Shaw
v
Beverley Joyce Hanlon

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
By video link from Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT,
9:15 am
Darren Martello v Dorset Council
Directions hearing re Orders

Jemma Barker v BIS Industries Limited ABN 13125202253
Directions Hearing – Orders

Anthony Saunders v Edward Grant Simmons
Directions Hearing

9:30am
Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Matthew Alexander Hill
Possession

Australia And New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Kathryn Veronica Cornelius
Possession

Commonwealth Bank Of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Luis Bolini Steel
Possession

Commonwealth Bank Of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) v Marcus Theo Hairon
Possession

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Witness on Final Notice

For Trial
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
(part-heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application and Preliminary
Proceedings Application via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Bradley Lawrence Mykael Gee
PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place,
Hobart and to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45a.m.
For Decision
Lee Anthony Shaw
v
Beverley Joyce Hanlon

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 13 February 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 74
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 74
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Lee Anthony Shaw brought proceedings against Beverley Joyce Hanlon in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, seeking an order to declare that Hanlon had breached a contract. The court was required to determine whether Hanlon had indeed breached the contract and, if so, to what extent Shaw had been damaged by the breach. Justice Brett delivered the judgment, finding that Hanlon had indeed breached the contract. The court ordered Hanlon to pay Shaw $50,000 in damages for the breach of contract, along with interest and costs.

The court considered the evidence presented by both parties, including the terms of the contract, the conduct of the parties, and the consequences of the breach. The court found that Hanlon had failed to fulfill her obligations under the contract, causing Shaw to suffer financial loss. The court assessed the amount of damages due to Shaw based on the loss suffered as a result of the breach and ordered Hanlon to pay the amount of $50,000, plus interest and costs. The court did not find it necessary to make any further orders.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.