Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 11 March 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Justice Pearce Criminal Jurisdiction 10:00amFor Trial MJP Â Â Â (part-heard)

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 11 MARCH 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
MJP
(part-heard)

4:15pm
For Sentence via video link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Alan Rex Jones

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Sentence via video link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Alan Rex Jones

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing
Denim Faye O’Connor

For Trial
Mark Richard Nicholas

1:00pm
For Trial
KJB

4.15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 8,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing (Part Heard)
Dong Jo Shin and anor v Yong Tae Cho and anor

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
TLR
Samuel John Johnson
Ryan John Williams

For Trial
Shaun Albert Leonard
(Part-heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
DKAT

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a dispute between Alan Rex Jones and the Crown, heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Justice Brett. Mr. Jones faced criminal charges and was undergoing a directions hearing to determine the progression of his case. The central legal issue was the procedural direction the court should provide in light of the charges against Mr. Jones. The court had to consider the nature of the charges, the evidence available, and any relevant legal precedents to decide on the appropriate steps forward in the criminal proceedings.

Justice Brett carefully examined the submissions from both parties and the evidence presented. The court assessed the seriousness of the charges, the complexity of the case, and the implications for Mr. Jones's right to a fair trial. After weighing these factors, Justice Brett concluded that the case required a structured approach to ensure all legal rights were protected and the trial proceeded efficiently. The court provided detailed directions, outlining the next steps, including the scheduling of further hearings and the exchange of evidence.

The final orders of the court included specific directives for the preparation and presentation of evidence, as well as a timeline for the upcoming hearings. These orders were designed to streamline the trial process and ensure that all parties were adequately prepared. The directions aimed to balance the need for a thorough investigation with the rights of the accused to a fair and timely trial.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established