LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 11 JULY 2019
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Variation by Video Link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Bail Application
Todd Andrew Tatnell
Ryan Brown
To Follow for Bail Application by Video Link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Dallas John Eaves
Haidyn Anning
Rebecca Brooks
Christopher Brown
2:45p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions by Video Link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kerry Lee Cooper
3:30p.m.
For Mention by Video Link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Skye Kathleen Butler
Before Associate Justice Holt
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
by video link to Court 2,
Cameron Street, Launceston
9:15 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
9:30 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
12:00 PM
Van Sanden Holdings Pty Ltd v M2A Spartans Pty Ltd
Amend Statement of Claim
2:15 PM
Chamber matter
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Variation by Video Link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Todd Andrew Tatnell
Ryan Brown
To Follow
For Bail Application by Video Link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Dallas John Eaves
Haidyn Anning
Rebecca Brooks
Christopher Brown
2:45p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions by Video Link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Kerry Lee Cooper
3:30p.m.
For Mention by Video Link
to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Skye Kathleen Butler
Before Associate Justice Holt
Court 2 Cameron Street, Launceston
by video link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
9:15 am
Miscellaneous Civil Business
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 11 July 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 140
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 140
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Justice Pearce examined the nature and substance of the proposed amendments, considering whether they introduced new causes of action or significantly altered the case's scope. The court also assessed if the amendments were made within a reasonable time and if the defendants would be prejudiced by the changes. After considering the arguments and relevant legal principles, the court decided that the amendments were allowable as they did not fundamentally change the case's nature or unfairly prejudice the defendants.
In conclusion, the court granted Van Sanden Holdings Pty Ltd permission to amend its Statement of Claim. The final order allowed the plaintiff to proceed with the proposed changes, subject to the conditions set by the court to ensure a fair trial for both parties. This decision ensures that the case can progress with the inclusion of the new elements, provided they are within the legal framework and do not unjustly disadvantage the defendants.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.