Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 1 December 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 1 DECEMBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention

A Witness

For Bail Variation
Stephen John Edwards
Corey Matthew Kedey

For Trial
Wayne Gregory Pattison
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael Thomas Jones
Nicholas Andrew Burn

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Trial
Corey Graeme Farr
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Zachariah Angus Denwer-Ripper

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

For Trial

Jane Elizabeth Holden

The State of Tasmania

(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Further Submissions via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors

Andrew John McCormack and Ors
v
Lihua Qin and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Justin Joseph Ewell

10:00am For Trial
PDW

4:00pm For Further Submissions via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Clarence City Council v Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors
Andrew John McCormack and Ors v Lihua Qin and Ors

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention by Video Link
Shaun Anthony Hugo
Christopher Luke Finn
Daniel Lee Upton

For Mention
Emma May Foster
Vanessa Rae Hardwick

For Bail Application
Mystie Lorraine Brooke

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Brady Christopher Oates
Joshua Joseph Goold
Dane Ronald Pyke
Dwayne Grant Seabourne

For Application
Raymond John Pennington

For Plea
DLJ
Steven John Henderson

For Bail Consent
Barry William Evans
Andrew Stephen Glover
Jodie Lynn Parkinson
Dale Graham Parkinson
Hayden Luke Ryan
Marshall Pearson Blythe Woolnough

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on 1 December 2016, which included various criminal and civil cases. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases were heard concerning bail variation, bail application, and trials. The civil jurisdiction included trials and further submissions on various matters, including disputes between Clarence City Council and private parties, and disputes between private individuals. The court also handled miscellaneous civil business via video link.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of matters, including the admissibility of evidence, the application of statutory provisions in bail decisions, and the interpretation of contractual obligations in civil disputes. The court needed to consider the evidence presented, the applicable laws, and the principles of justice in determining the outcomes of these cases.

The court's reasoning in these cases involved a detailed analysis of the facts, legal precedents, and statutory provisions. The court assessed the credibility of witnesses, the relevance and weight of evidence, and the applicability of legal principles to the specific circumstances of each case. In criminal matters, the court balanced the rights of the accused with the need to protect the community. In civil matters, the court interpreted contracts, assessed damages, and resolved disputes between parties.

The final orders of the court included variations of bail conditions, continuation of trials, and decisions on the admissibility of evidence. In civil cases, the court made determinations on contractual obligations, damages, and the resolution of disputes between parties. The outcomes of these cases reflect the court's role in upholding the rule of law and resolving disputes in accordance with legal principles and precedents.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established