Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 1 August 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 1 AUGUST 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

Jason Darrall Triffett

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:45 a.m.

For Directions Hearing

Victor Kent Park

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Christopher John Worker

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart

Before Associate Justice Holt

9:15am

By video link to Cameron Street, Launceston

Miscellaneous Civil Business

9:30 am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:30p.m.

For Preliminary Proceedings Application via Video Link

from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

PEA

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Charles John Rattray

Adrian Michael Johnson

For Trial

KSM

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.

For Trial

CJW

4:15p.m.

For Bail Application

Craig Ashley Delaney

(Part Heard)

4:30p.m.

For Preliminary Proceedings Application by Video Link

PEA

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over a part-heard case involving Jason Darrall Triffett, which was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. The nature of the dispute involved criminal jurisdiction, with specific details of the charges and arguments not disclosed in the document. The case was part-heard, indicating that it was not concluded in this sitting and would require further proceedings.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the interpretation and application of criminal law as it related to the charges against Mr. Triffett. The court had to consider the admissibility of evidence, the rights of the accused, and the procedural aspects of the trial. Given that the case was only part-heard, the exact nature of the legal issues being resolved was not fully elaborated in the document.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not explicitly detailed in the document. However, the part-heard nature of the case suggests that significant legal deliberation and discussion were necessary, and these would continue in future proceedings. The court would have considered the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both parties, and relevant case law to reach a decision. Further sessions would be required to conclude the case and determine the final outcome.

The document does not provide specific final orders, as the case was only part-heard and would need additional court sittings to reach a conclusion. The outcomes of subsequent hearings would determine the final orders regarding the charges against Jason Darrall Triffett.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established