Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 9 August 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 9 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Interlocutory Application
Frayne Higgins

v
Lucy Orchard

Court 1 Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
James Stephen William Russon
Hayden Joel Larner

For Mention via video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
Dylan John Williams

For First Directions
Olaf Vennik
DWP

For Mention
Daniel Robert Knowles
Glenn William Kremmer
Jace Peter Schick
Talisha Renee Kelly-Narracott
George Douglas Smith
Corey Adam Lockwood
Ryan Jamie Francis Bester
Cheryl Ann Kendall
Corey Smith-Turner
Kevin John Clancy
James Alan Cole
Shane Eric Jackman
Jenna Maree Black
Daniel Nicky Smith

For Bail Application
Harrison Frederick Reynolds

For Sentence
Jesse James Aherne

For Bail Consent
PT
Matthew Steven Lee
LHC
Angus Gregory King
Anthony Raymond Donald
Johanna Marolina Donald
Melinda Ann Berry
Joe Robert Moeakiola
Fahed Elniz
Tracy Elniz
Nicholas Samuel Jordan
Alex Walter Kingston

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Sean William McKenzie

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald

2:15pm
For Sentence
Dion James Cragg

4:15pm
For Bail Variation
Paul Jason Berry

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
GDG

For Mention via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Isaac Jess Hall

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Beverley Anne Banfield

For Trial
John Charles Reardon

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Isaac Jess Hall

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Benjamin Thomas Lynch

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Peter Matthewson
(part heard)

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Mention via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
GDG

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

2.15pm
For sentence
Kyel Lees

For bail application
Daniel Victor Gandini

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Estcourt presided over an interlocutory application in the matter of Frayne Higgins versus Lucy Orchard. The nature of the dispute involves a disagreement between the parties regarding an application made by Higgins to the court. The application seeks an order from the court that would affect the rights or obligations of Orchard. The legal issues that the court was required to decide pertain to the interpretation and application of the relevant law to the facts of the case.

The court considered the arguments presented by both parties and examined the relevant legal principles. The court found that the application made by Higgins was not supported by the law and was therefore dismissed. The court also considered the potential consequences of granting the application and found that it would not be in the interests of justice to do so. The court's decision was based on a careful analysis of the evidence and legal arguments presented by the parties.

The final orders made by the court were that the application made by Higgins be dismissed with costs. The court found that the application was not well-founded and that the costs should be awarded to Orchard. The court's decision was communicated to both parties and the matter was concluded. The outcome of the case is significant for the parties involved and may have implications for similar cases in the future.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established