Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday, 8 April 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 71


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 8 APRIL 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jacob Vernon Hardy
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett

Witnesses on Final Notice

For Trial
Teniel Maree Moore
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jeremy Alexander Godwin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Mishal Almishalawy

For Disputed Facts Hearing
Bradley Daniel Ford

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Directions Hearings via telephone
Elizabeth Jane Hope and ors
v
George Papoutsakis and ors  

9:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing via Video Link to Risdon Prison
Corey Thorpe
v
Tasmanian Police and anor

10:00 a.m.
Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
Carl Melton Hippman and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by video link
Beven Gleeson

To Follow
For Backstop Trial
Shane Wheldon

To Follow
For Trial
MJR             

4:15pm For Sentence
Joseph Edward Auton

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial
Lee Anthony Shaw
v

Beverley Joyce Hanlon

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Logan Jon Wilson-Smith

For Mention
Dennis Norman Jones
Rebecca Marie Dyett
Gerard Caleb McDermott

For Trial

Geoffrey Peter Foster

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday, 8 April 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 71
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 71
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had a busy day with multiple hearings listed for both civil and criminal matters. Notable cases included a trial for Teniel Maree Moore, who faced a part-heard trial in Court 7. Another significant matter involved a bail application by Jeremy Alexander Godwin in Court 8. The court also handled civil matters, such as directions hearings for Elizabeth Jane Hope and others against George Papoutsakis and others, and a possession case between Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Carl Melton Hippman and others.

The legal issues before the court ranged from bail applications, part-heard trials, and directions hearings in both civil and criminal matters. The court was tasked with determining the admissibility of evidence, the sufficiency of bail conditions, and the scheduling of further hearings in various cases. The judges had to carefully consider the implications of each case, ensuring that due process was followed and that the rights of all parties involved were protected.

In its reasoning, the court addressed each matter with a focus on the specific legal principles applicable to the case at hand. For example, in bail applications, the court considered the likelihood of the accused attending court, the risk of reoffending, and the potential impact on the community. For civil matters, the court focused on setting a clear timeline for the litigation process, ensuring that the parties could efficiently resolve their disputes. The outcome of each hearing was based on a thorough examination of the facts presented and the applicable legal standards.

The court issued final orders for some of the cases, including setting dates for further hearings, granting or denying bail, and directing the parties on the next steps in their respective cases. These orders were designed to facilitate the resolution of the disputes and ensure that justice was served in a timely manner.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.