LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 8 APRIL 2019
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jacob Vernon Hardy
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett
Witnesses on Final Notice
For Trial
Teniel Maree Moore
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Jeremy Alexander Godwin
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Mishal Almishalawy
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Bradley Daniel Ford
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Directions Hearings via telephone
Elizabeth Jane Hope and ors
v
George Papoutsakis and ors
9:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing via Video Link to Risdon Prison
Corey Thorpe
v
Tasmanian Police and anor
10:00 a.m.
Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
Carl Melton Hippman and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention by video link
Beven Gleeson
To Follow
For Backstop Trial
Shane Wheldon
To Follow
For Trial
MJR
4:15pm For Sentence
Joseph Edward Auton
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Lee Anthony Shaw
v
Beverley Joyce Hanlon
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Logan Jon Wilson-Smith
For Mention
Dennis Norman Jones
Rebecca Marie Dyett
Gerard Caleb McDermott
For Trial
Geoffrey Peter Foster
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Monday, 8 April 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 71
- Case
- [2019] TASSCCourtlist 71
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court ranged from bail applications, part-heard trials, and directions hearings in both civil and criminal matters. The court was tasked with determining the admissibility of evidence, the sufficiency of bail conditions, and the scheduling of further hearings in various cases. The judges had to carefully consider the implications of each case, ensuring that due process was followed and that the rights of all parties involved were protected.
In its reasoning, the court addressed each matter with a focus on the specific legal principles applicable to the case at hand. For example, in bail applications, the court considered the likelihood of the accused attending court, the risk of reoffending, and the potential impact on the community. For civil matters, the court focused on setting a clear timeline for the litigation process, ensuring that the parties could efficiently resolve their disputes. The outcome of each hearing was based on a thorough examination of the facts presented and the applicable legal standards.
The court issued final orders for some of the cases, including setting dates for further hearings, granting or denying bail, and directing the parties on the next steps in their respective cases. These orders were designed to facilitate the resolution of the disputes and ensure that justice was served in a timely manner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.