Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 6 September 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOODCriminal Jurisdiction9:30 a.m.For Trial (Part-Heard)Daniel Robert Knowles10:00...

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 6 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Daniel Robert Knowles

10:00 a.m.
Witness on Final Notice
Benjamin John Ward

For Mention
Michael John Hopkinson and Kain Lewis Cowen

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Samuel David Maple

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Phillip Mark Dare
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Lee Mark Phillips
Caleb Adams
MMP
ATR
Dylan John Williams

For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Samuel Jordan
Andrew Roger Fairfield
Glenn Williams Kremmer
Adrian Alwyn Pickett
Olaf Vennik
James Alan Cole
Christopher Mac Hatty
Frances Adele Young
Trent Mervyn Leonard
Matthew James Butterworth
Peter Charles Anderson
Bradley Dale Ramanauska
Andrew Peter Wall
LHC
Angus Gregory King
Anthony Raymond Donald
Johanna Marolina Donald
Christopher John Howard
Abel Beau Warren
Corey James Wordsworth

For Bail Variation
Travis Anthony Mortyn

For Application
Kyle Richard Dupree

For Plea
Jace Peter Schick

For Facts and Sentence
Skye Louise Kory

For Bail Consent
Anthony Trevor Schulthorpe
Anthony James Hill
Matthew Steven Lee
Jayden Lawrence Croft
Wayne James Benjamin
Reuben Pingel
John Reeves
Paul Jason Berry
Sharon Maree Bailey
Ashley Gerard Dinnissen
Genesis Meir-Anderson
Paige Samantha Triffett
John Spiro Fiotakis
Ben Bryan Nichols
SAT
Cheng Li
Yassir Shifa Ali
Fahad Al-Dakak
Carroll Anderson-Lingo
Jordyn Jack Webb
Jodie Kaye Moffatt
AJC
Emma Lillian Rainbird
Samuel Edward Chorazialk
Joshua John Barda

2:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
JKW

For Facts and Sentencing Submissions
Jason Clifford Gordon

For Plea
Andrew Roger Fairfield

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For mention
Christopher John Howard

For witness on final notice
In the trial of James Stuart Walker

For trial
James Stuart Walker

4.15pm
For bail application by video-link
Rielly Bennett

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Alesha Nyl Prentice

4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Peter Richard Anderson

For Application
Liam James Dougherty

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Mention
Jamie Lee Stein

For Trial
Thomas Joseph Gardam

4:15 pm
For Directions Hearing
Gemma Maria Wilby

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, before Justice Wood, the matter of Daniel Robert Knowles was heard in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The nature of the dispute involved a criminal trial that was part-heard. The court needed to address legal issues pertaining to the evidence presented and the application of relevant criminal law principles. Justice Wood examined the prosecution's case, the credibility of witnesses, and the defence submissions in determining the appropriate legal framework to apply. The outcome hinged on whether the prosecution could prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

Justice Wood meticulously evaluated the testimonies and the evidence provided by both parties. The court focused on the reliability and consistency of the witnesses, especially those who were on final notice. The judge applied the principles of criminal law, ensuring that the rights of the defendant were upheld throughout the proceedings. The decision was influenced by the strength of the prosecution's evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the prosecution, finding the defendant guilty on the charges presented.

The final orders of the court included the defendant being found guilty on the charges brought against him. The specifics of sentencing and any further legal consequences were to be determined in subsequent proceedings. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the presented evidence and the application of relevant criminal law standards.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established