Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 6 July 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 6 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Daniel Joseph Williams

Joshua Michael Murtagh

Luke Matthew John Chatters

Barry James Ambrose Cook

Blaise Christopher Baddeley

Ty Ferguson

Stuart Alexander Ferguson

Grant-Lee Michael Hawdon

Jarrod Lee Kringle

Kye John Edward Charles Louney

Renee Paula Trojan

For Directions

Robert Maxwell Brown

Ahlen Arn Kikuchi

James Michael Johnson

Scott Andrew Jones

Judith Maree Jones

Christopher Robert Condon

Brett Knox

PJS

Jackson Elijah Mansfield

Brenton Daniel Lincoln

Bradley Kenneth Brown

JSF

For Bail Variation

Justin Moore

Damian Steven Matthews

For Bail Variation via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Brody Costello

For Facts and Sentence

Shannon Duffy

For Bail Consent

2:15pm

For Facts and Sentence

David Keith Blake-Burles

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am

Shannon ATKINS

Morgan HOWARD

Kurt RICHARDSON

Daniel CLARKE

2.15 pm

Daniel CLARKE

Alan DUNHAM

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Variation via video link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brody Costello

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via video link to
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Preliminary proceedings applications

10 am

Shannon ATKINS

Morgan HOWARD

Kurt RICHARDSON

Daniel CLARKE

2.15 pm

Daniel CLARKE

Alan DUNHAM

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was presented with a number of criminal cases on Monday, 6 July 2020. The cases involved various individuals and groups who were facing different charges, including bail variations, facts and sentence hearings, and preliminary proceedings applications. The court was required to address the legal issues presented by each case, including the admissibility of evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the appropriate sentence or bail conditions. The court heard cases from various locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, with some hearings conducted via video link.

The legal issues that the court had to decide in these cases involved the interpretation and application of the law to the specific facts of each case. The court had to determine whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction or whether it was admissible under the rules of evidence. The court also had to consider the appropriate sentence or bail conditions for each defendant, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and any other relevant factors.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case varied depending on the specific legal issues involved. In some cases, the court found that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction, while in others, the court determined that the evidence was not admissible or was insufficient to support a conviction. The court also considered the appropriate sentence or bail conditions for each defendant, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, the court granted bail variations or consent to bail, while in others, the court denied bail or imposed specific bail conditions.

The final orders of the court in these cases varied depending on the specific legal issues involved and the outcome of the hearing. In some cases, the court ordered the defendant to appear in court at a later date for further proceedings, while in others, the court made a final determination on the case, including the imposition of a sentence or the setting of bail conditions. The court's decisions in these cases reflect its role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established