Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 4 March 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 4 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Court of Criminal Appeal
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Chris Jenkins
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
David John Eaton
Daniel Cure
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link
NMM

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
NVL

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

3:30 p.m.
For Bail Application
Kody Lee Bryan

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
MLJ

For Mention
Troy Craig Browne

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 1, Cameron Street Launceston
Joseph William Freeman

For Bail Application
Jayden Grant Horne
Timothy Geoffrey Briers
Cathryn May Ellis

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Directions hearing by Telephone
Hookway Aerospace Pty Limited (In Liquidation)
v
Stirling Mathew Hookway

9:45 a.m.
Direction hearing by Telephone
Scott Andrew Bloom and anor
v
Justin John Schmidt and ors

10:00 a.m.
Consent Orders
Kathleen Grace Burdon
v
Roger Lewin Burdon

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm For Bail Application via video link
From Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Joseph William Freeman

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Chris Jenkins has brought a case against the State of Tasmania before the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but it involves a legal action brought by an individual against the state government. The case is scheduled for hearing in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice WOOD.

The legal issues the court was required to decide are not specified in the text. However, given that the matter involves a dispute between an individual and the state, it likely concerns matters of public law, possibly involving administrative law, constitutional law, or tort law. The court's role would be to interpret and apply relevant legal principles to the facts of the case, determining the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

The reasoning and outcome of the case are not provided in the text. However, the court's decision would be based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. The outcome could result in a ruling in favour of either the plaintiff or the defendant, depending on the court's interpretation of the law and the facts of the case. The court may also provide reasons for its decision, explaining the legal principles and reasoning that led to its conclusion.

If a fourth paragraph is required, it would likely detail the final orders made by the court. The orders could include a determination of liability, an award of damages, or other legal remedies available to the parties. The court may also provide directions for any further proceedings or specify the next steps in the case. However, without further information, it is not possible to provide specific details about the final orders made by the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established