Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 3 May 2021hobart

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 3 MAY 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
J S F

4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
J L H

For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
Ronald Athol Keating

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Allen Michael Prestage and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Michael Thorne and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Scott Francis Howells and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
(Part-heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
KWDF

4:00pm
For Bail Application
Jai Craig Nichols

4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges

For Mention
Bradley JonesAmanda Louise White
IRK

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Jacob Scott Riley-McDonald
Alani Povalu Moeakiola

For Directions Hearing
Brandon James Smith
Kye Douglas Glenn Palmer
Matthew Steven Lee
MJP
Casey Nicholas Booth
Adam John Munnings
Roderick Leigh Triffett
Anthony Stephen Butcher
MJL
Joseph Andrew Tonner
JSF
Jorden Bird
Shane Christopher Hardman
Daniel Robert Knowles
ACL
ABM
KL
Jace Peter Schick
David Jeffrey Burridge
JAJ

For Bail Consent
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts
Patrick Simon Bailey
Peter Stanley Cormie
Matthew Lionel Knowles
DLQ
Jeremy Mark Quinn
ATDS
Ashley Dean Brown
Judd Paul Kraemers
Peter Charles Anderson
Michael Jay Edgerton
Nathan Matthew Harrison
Samuel Edward Chorazialk
George Douglas Smith

For Facts and Sentence
Jarrod Christopher Shaw

For Plea via video-link to PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

For Application
Kye Scott James

Re Aaron James Irwin: Application for Forfeiture of Recognisance

For Bail Application via video-link to PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie and to Ron Barwick Prison
Shayden Aaron Burgess

For Bail Application
Mitchell Andrew Allie

For Mention
ATR

2:15p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Aaron James Irwin
Steven Craig Murtagh

3:00p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Kain Lewis Cowen

For Plea
Thomas Ezekiel Ricketts

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via MS Teams
For Interlocutory Application
Amelia Jane ROWE v Terrence ANDREWS and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00
For Mention
Joshua Lee Scott

For Bail Variation
Corey Mitchell Gesler

For Directions Hearing
Jack-Harrison Vincent Sadler

Witness on Final Notice
PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Plea via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m
For Mention
Andrew Stewart Morrison
Zannon Tony Howard
Simon Cole Wigg

For Bail Consent
Jayden Garry Fehlberg

For Trial
Shane Anthony Dyson
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m but not before 4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Hobart
J S F

4:00 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Hobart
J L H

For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Court 1, Hobart
Ronald Athol Keating

PWR, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Ron Barwick Prison
SAB

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice ESTC presided over a civil trial involving three separate cases: Allen Michael Prestage and others v Melissa Jayne Barrett, Michael Thorne and others v Melissa Jayne Barrett, and Scott Francis Howells and others v Melissa Jayne Barrett. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the document, but it appears to be related to civil litigation. The trial was part-heard at Court 7 in Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide are not explicitly stated in the document. However, it is likely that the court was required to determine the facts of the case, the liability of the defendants, and the appropriate remedies or damages to be awarded to the plaintiffs. The court would have had to consider the evidence presented by both parties, as well as any relevant legal principles and precedents.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not provided in the document. It is possible that the trial was still ongoing at the time the document was published, or that the court had not yet delivered its judgment. In any event, the court would have had to carefully consider the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, and apply the relevant legal principles to reach a decision.

If the court had delivered its judgment, it would have set out its reasoning in a written judgment or oral reasons for judgment. The judgment would have explained the court's findings of fact, its application of the law to those facts, and its ultimate decision on the issues before it. The outcome of the trial would have depended on the specific circumstances of each case, and the evidence and arguments presented by the parties.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established