Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 27 May 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 109


27th May, 2019

HOBART

Court Number 1

Full Court

10:00 am | Appeal

Director of Housing v Gregory Parsons

For hearing

HOBART

Court Number 7

Justice Estcourt

3:00 pm | Criminal

Craig John Smith

For application

Justice Estcourt

3:00 pm | Criminal

Justin Paul Moore

For bail application

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 27 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 109
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 109
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was occupied with multiple cases on 27 May 2019. One of the matters was an appeal by the Director of Housing against a decision made by the Magistrate in the Magistrates Court. The subject of the appeal was a decision regarding the housing of Gregory Parsons. Another matter was a criminal case involving Craig John Smith, who had a hearing scheduled before Justice Estcourt. In addition, there was a criminal case concerning Justin Paul Moore, who had a bail application set for the same day before Justice Estcourt.

The legal issues that the court had to address in the appeal by the Director of Housing included whether the Magistrate's decision on the housing of Gregory Parsons was correct and whether the Director of Housing had the authority to challenge the decision. In the criminal case involving Craig John Smith, the court needed to consider the evidence presented and determine whether the charges against him were proven beyond reasonable doubt. In the case of Justin Paul Moore, the court had to assess the circumstances surrounding his bail application and decide whether there were sufficient grounds to grant or refuse bail.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case were not provided in the document. The appeal by the Director of Housing would have involved a detailed examination of the Magistrate's decision, the relevant laws and regulations, and the evidence presented. In the criminal case involving Craig John Smith, the court would have considered the prosecution's case and any defence arguments to determine whether the charges were proven. In the case of Justin Paul Moore, the court would have evaluated the circumstances of the case, the risk of flight or reoffending, and any other relevant factors to decide on the bail application. The final orders in each case would have been made by the court after considering all the evidence and arguments presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.