Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 24 September 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link
Zachary Dylan Wright
Lai Le

For Mention
Daiki Ishikawa-Browne

For Trial
Amir Lee
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Justin Cleaver
v
State of Tasmania

For Directions Hearing
Kayne Quinn

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
MDR

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

9:30 a.m.
For Further Submissions
Robert Frank Nightingale and anor
v
Recorder of Titles

In Court
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex

Thomas James Aliano
v

Sergeant Michael Ashwood

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Robert William Broad
Chirack Mwanza Kadima
James Peter Sampson
Andrew Rex Gleeson

To Follow
For Trial
Brendan Craig Green
(Part Heard)

4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Gary Raymond Cooper

To Follow
For Application to Withdraw as Surety
Teegan Smith

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Wood presided over the case of Lai Le against Zachary Dylan Wright, which was scheduled for a mention by video link. Lai Le, the plaintiff, initiated the legal proceedings against Zachary Dylan Wright, the defendant, to address a specific dispute. The nature of the conflict and the claims made by Lai Le against Wright were not detailed in the provided text. The court was tasked with determining the legal issues arising from this dispute and to provide a decision that would resolve the matter at hand. The court's role was to interpret the relevant laws, assess the evidence presented, and apply the appropriate legal principles to reach a conclusion that would be binding on both parties.

The legal issues that the court had to decide involved interpreting the claims made by Lai Le and assessing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court was required to determine whether the claims made by Lai Le were valid, and if so, what remedies or outcomes should be awarded to Lai Le against Zachary Dylan Wright. The court had to consider the relevant laws and legal precedents to ensure a fair and just resolution of the dispute. The outcome of the case would depend on the court's interpretation of the evidence and the application of the relevant legal principles.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided text. However, the court would have carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, and applied the relevant laws and legal principles to reach a decision. The court's decision would have been based on a thorough analysis of the case and would have been aimed at resolving the dispute in a fair and just manner. The outcome of the case would have provided a resolution to the legal issues at hand and would have been binding on both parties.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established