Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 19 March 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 19 MARCH 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
Dillon Anthony Davey
Scott Raymond Dale
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Simon Anthony Catto

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michael William Triffitt
Corey Matthew Kedey

For Mention via video link
Brendan Lee Jones

For Bail Consent

For Trial

DFP
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Christopher John Humphreys
Christopher Ernest Denman

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Scott Davidson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Guy Jon Lorenz
Scott Phillip Strahan

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Marcus James Winzer
Scott Andrew Smith

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Brocklands Pty Ltd, which was suing Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. The dispute centred around issues of contract law and the specific terms of the agreement between the two parties. The case was heard in Court 1, before Justice GeASON.

The primary legal issues that the court had to address were whether there was a valid and enforceable contract between the parties, and if so, whether there were any breaches of the contract by either party. The court also had to determine the remedies available to the plaintiff if a breach was found.

Justice GeASON delivered a detailed judgment, analysing the contract in question and the evidence presented by both parties. The court found that there was indeed a valid and enforceable contract between Brocklands Pty Ltd and Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. The court also found that there had been breaches of the contract by Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. Consequently, the court awarded damages to Brocklands Pty Ltd, as well as an order for specific performance.

This case underscores the importance of clear and unambiguous contract terms and the need for both parties to adhere to their contractual obligations. The decision also highlights the court's willingness to enforce contractual agreements and provide appropriate remedies for breaches.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established