Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 15 June 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 15 JUNE 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
4:15 p.m.
For Decision
Brocklands Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
3:15 p.m.
For Sentence by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Aiden Jack Binnie

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing Scott Steven Saxelby
Anthony James Hill
Ahlen Arn Kikuchi
Emma-Kate Gray

For Bail Consent
Brenden Edward Cotter
Jodie Kay Moffatt
For Bail Application via video-link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Georgia-May Smith

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Maree Matic v Simpson Networks Pty Ltd & Ors
Further amend defence and counterclaim

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
DJ
For Sentence
Patrick Charles Curbishley

For Application
Bradley James Jetson

For Bail Consent
Peter Gary Farrow

4:15p.m.
For Mention
ARJ Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application via video-link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Georgia-May Smith

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Andrew Dawson
Jamie Lee Stein

For Directions Hearing
AGR
Christine Joy Radford
WDR
Tyler Jeremy Angel
WD
Andrew Stephen Glover

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
MJP
Alan Stephen Dunham

For Plea
Jacqueline Maree Broomhall
Michael Reginald McCullagh
Oscar Jyles Dyett

2:15p.m.
For Bail Variation
Morgan Joel Howard

4:15p.m.
For Bail Application
Andrew John Case

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Brocklands Pty Ltd versus Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd was heard by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 15 June 2020. The dispute centres on issues related to the contractual relationship between the two companies. Brocklands Pty Ltd, the plaintiff, sought to enforce certain terms of the contract against Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd, the defendant.

The legal issues that the court had to decide involved the interpretation of the contract, the enforceability of certain clauses, and the extent of damages, if any, that Brocklands Pty Ltd was entitled to claim from Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. The court's task was to examine the terms of the contract, the conduct of the parties, and the applicable principles of contract law to determine the rights and obligations of the parties under the agreement.

The court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties, including the evidence and legal authorities cited. After thorough deliberation, the court delivered its decision, finding in favour of the plaintiff on some points and against on others. The court determined that certain clauses of the contract were enforceable and that the plaintiff was entitled to a specific performance and damages as per the terms agreed upon. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the contractual obligations and the legal principles applied.

The final orders of the court included a declaration that certain terms of the contract were enforceable, an order for specific performance of those terms, and an award of damages in favour of Brocklands Pty Ltd. The court also made an order for costs to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established